Three out of four consults billed incorrectly, OIG says
The recommendations: Medicare should educate physicians about how to bill for consults, the OIG urges. This schooling should include when to bill the highest level of consultation.
Now’s the time to review how you bill for consults--before the feds come and start investigating your files.
Consults look like a juicy target to fraud-busters in the wake of a new report by the HHS Office of Inspector General that found 75 percent of consults didn’t meet Medicare requirements. Only one third of the dollars billed in 2001, $1.1 billion out of $3.3 billion, were incorrect, but that’s still a high price tag.
Here are the problems:
• Nearly half of all consults (47 percent) were billed as the wrong type of consult or at an incorrect level, accounting for $613 million in consult billings. In particular, 41 percent of consults were upcoded and 5 percent were downcoded, the OIG says. One-third of upcoded services were upcoded by two levels, and 10 percent were upcoded by three levels.
• One in five consults (19 percent) didn’t meet Medicare’s definition of a consult and should have been billed as a regular evaluation & management visit, adding up to $191 million in incorrect billings. Most of these visits “were actually lower-paying regular office or inpatient visits,” the OIG says. Providers also tried to bill for a psychiatric diagnostic interview or a discharge management service as initial inpatient consultations. Also, two consults were actually provided by nurses, who aren’t eligible to bill for them.
• Nearly one out of every 10 consultations (9 percent) did not have enough documentation to justify billing a consult, and this cost Medicare $260 million. Reviewers found no documentation in the patient’s medical record, including records from the consulting physician, the requesting physician and the facility.
• Almost all consults billed at the highest level (95 percent) were coded incorrectly, the OIG says. On average, these were upcoded by 1.9 levels, meaning almost all of these level-five consults should have been level three instead.
One problem solved: The OIG especially had a problem with providers billing a follow-up inpatient consultation incorrectly. Some 94 percent of follow-up inpatient consults should have been billed as a different service. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services pointed out that CPT Codes 2006 already deleted the follow-up inpatient consultation and confirmatory consultation codes.