Otolaryngology Coding Alert

You Be the Coder:

Play It Safe By Billing Repeated Nosebleed Procedure With Modifier 59

Question: My physician saw a patient at the hospital for a nosebleed. Later that day, another physician saw the same patient in emergency for severe nosebleed. She spent an hour to get the nosebleed under control. Should I use modifier 77 to bill both doctors?Tennessee SubscriberAnswer: No. In theory, modifier 77 (Repeat procedure or services by another physician or other qualified health care professional) may be correct if the exact same CPT® is repeated. However, most payers do not pay non-diagnostic procedures limited to the 7xxxx and 8xxxx sections of the CPT® manual with the 76 and 77 modifiers.In the case of the procedure in question, 30903 (Controlnasal hemorrhage, anterior, complex [extensive cautery and/or packing] any method), the only way to get it paid with most payers is by appending modifier 59 (Distinct procedural service). Based on your question, I assume the second doctor is in the same practice as [...]
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in Revenue Cycle Insider
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more

Other Articles in this issue of

Otolaryngology Coding Alert

View All

Which Codify by AAPC tool is right for you?

Call 844-334-2816 to speak with a Codify by AAPC specialist now.