Question: Massachusetts Subscriber Answer: Red flag: Before filing the claim, get the information you need to avoid using an unspecified code. If you don't have access to the physician's notes, go back to the allergist for more information, if the documentation supports assigning an asthma code at all. If the allergist simply mentions that the patient has a history of asthma, you may want to reconsider reporting 493.xx. Part of the decision depends on the place of service: • Inpatient: In this case, code the secondary diagnosis because you need as many comorbidity ICD-9 codes as possible to support the assigned E/M level in a facility setting. • Outpatient: Look at whether the visit addresses the asthma. If the patient's asthma is not causing any problems, the condition may not warrant using an ICD-9 code. But if the condition affects the plan of care (for instance, the patient's asthma medication impacts the bronchitis treatment), report the condition. You don't indicate that the patient's asthma is exacerbated (493.x2, ... with [acute] exacerbation) or that the condition requires treatment with a nebulizer, so the patient's asthma is probably stable. In this case, you would use a fifth-digit subclassification of "0." You can assign the appropriate specific asthma code with one more piece of information: the patient's asthma type. Use 493.00 for a stable extrinsic (typical) asthmatic and 493.10 for a stable intrinsic (less common) asthmatic.