Otolaryngology Coding Alert
Reader Question:
Claim With 12051 and 11442 Should Be Allowed
Published on Fri Jan 17, 2014
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
Other Articles in this issue of
Otolaryngology Coding Alert
- CCI 20.0:
Don't Jump to Report New Consultative Services Codes, Thanks to Bundling Edits
Tip: Assume modifier indicator ‘0’ applies. The latest rendition of Correct Coding Initiative (CCI) edits [...] - Quality Reporting:
Prepare to Implement 4 New PQRS Measures for Otolaryngology in 2014
Also watch for opportunities to report the measure’s group for sleep apnea. CMS finalized 285 [...] - Compliance:
Let 3 Tips Start Your Year With Better Provider Documentation
Hint: Legibility and timing are still top concerns. Coding accuracy might be your top priority [...] - ICD-10:
Encourage Physicians to Document 'Recurrent' for Future Acute Sinusitis Diagnoses
General descriptors for 461 code family make a straightforward shift. With a new focus on [...] - You Be the Coder:
Reporting Ear Tube Insertion Under MAC
Question: Our physician removed a patient’s ear tubes in an ASC setting under MAC anesthesia [...] - Reader Question:
Appeal Payer's Decision to Bundle 30560 With 30130
Question: One of our private payers has started bundling 30560 with 30130. I haven’t found these codes [...] - Reader Question:
'Unlisted' 42299 or 69799 Are Best Choice for Rerouting Palatal Muscle
Question: Our ENT wants to offer a new procedure for the treatment of patulous Eustachian [...] - Reader Question:
Claim With 12051 and 11442 Should Be Allowed
Question: Humana denied our claim listing 12051 with 11442. We’re not sure what the problem [...] - Reader Question:
Remember Modifier 59 for 60252/60240 Claim
Question: The surgeon performed a left thyroidectomy for malignancy, with a neck dissection and a [...]
View All
