Otolaryngology Coding Alert

Modifier:

Two Surgeons, One Procedure, Distinct Portions: Modifier 62 Provides Your Solution

Fail to report the same CPT®, modifier for both surgeons, and you waste $2K.Don't mess up your multi-provider coding by assigning the wrong modifier(s). Modifiers can be a friend or a foe, depending on how you use them -- or when you use them.Scenario: The otolaryngologist performs the approach for an orthopedist who does a spinal osteotomy with neck exploration. The case of two surgeons calls for the use of a modifier, but which one?The main key in a multi-provider scenario is to treat each physician's work as a separate activity. However, deciding when to report a case as co-surgery, assistant surgery -- or something else -- has more to it than meets the eye. Find out with these frequently asked questions.1. What Distinct Roles Do Modifiers 62, 80, 81, 82 Play?You know that a modifier is at hand in this case, but more importantly you should be able to tell what role [...]
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in Revenue Cycle Insider
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more

Other Articles in this issue of

Otolaryngology Coding Alert

View All

Which Codify by AAPC tool is right for you?

Call 844-334-2816 to speak with a Codify by AAPC specialist now.