Otolaryngology Coding Alert

Fulfill Audio Test Delivery Requirement to Avoid Overcharging

Breaking news: Not all test administrations deserve equivalent pay Think using the same codes for professional-performed and computer-administered audiological testing doesn't seem fair? CPT is on your side. The AMA recently used administration to delineate coding audiologic function tests 92557 (Comprehensive audiometry threshold evaluation and speech recognition [92553 and 92556 combined]), 92567 (Tympanometry [impedance testing]), 92568 (Acoustic reflex testing; threshold) and 92587 (Evoked otoacoustic emissions; limited [single stimulus level, either transient or distortion products]). Make sure you keep your coding on the straight and narrow with this expert advice. Tip 1: Limit Traditional Codes to Professional Run Before you file another claim for 92557, 92567, 92568 and 92587, check that the tests meet this criterion: an audiologist or other qualified healthcare provider administers them. Reporting these codes would be inappropriate "if they are performed by a computer instead of a healthcare professional," according to the September 2007 CPT Assistant question and answer "Medicine: Special Otorhinolaryngological Services." Tip 2: Capture Professional Work With Test Codes The AMA bases its stipulation on the audiological test code's relative value units (RVUs). "The current codes (92557, 92567, 92568, etc.) are valued on the personal delivery of services by a professional," says Robert C. Fifer, PhD, associate professor and director of audiology and speech pathology at the University of Miami's Mailman Center for Child Development. An audiologist or other qualified healthcare provider administers the automated tests (that is, otoacoustic emissions, ABR, tympanometry). The healthcare professional "oversees the results to ensure accuracy of outcomes and ensures that the findings are in clinical agreement with other test outcomes," Fifer says. Tip 3: Recognize That Automated Should Pay Less New technology opened the door to potential misuse of 92557, 92567, 92568 and 92587. These codes- descriptors and valuations "do not take into account automated administration of these tests," Fifer says. Using the traditional codes for automated tests overcompensates you by paying you for non-performed work. "Computer-administered tests, such as the Otogram, do not rely on the administration and oversight of a professional to determine the outcome," Fifer says. Instead: After the patient has the earphones placed and some introductory instructions, these tests can be self-administered, the Otogram Web site says. The computer administers each test, automatically determines the accuracy of the outcome, scores the results where scoring is necessary, and prints the results in a written output. "Our physicians and audiologists were concerned with the reliability of patient-performed tests," says Janet Agemian, CPC, revenue cycle manager at Associates in Ear, Nose, Throat & Facial Plastic Surgery PA in Woodbury, N.J. What would the patient do if she had a problem? Tip 4: Default to 92700 for Machine-Run Test To avoid overcharging for a computer-administered test, you-ll have to [...]
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in your eNewsletter
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs*
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more
*CEUs available with select eNewsletters.

Other Articles in this issue of

Otolaryngology Coding Alert

View All