Otolaryngology Coding Alert

Work through four examples to drive the point home.

Most otolaryngology coders, beginner or advanced, will attest to struggling to understand some of the fundamental differences between myringoplasty and tympanic membrane repair procedures at some point in their careers.

While the underlying procedures are respectively similar, there’s a few key points you can identify to easily discern between the two.

Have a look at a few examples and corresponding pointers to take your middle-ear repair coding to the next level.

Pinpoint Similarities, Differences Between 69610, 69620

The purpose of this article is to break the following two CPT^® codes down to their bare bones:

• 69610 (Tympanic membrane repair, with or without site preparation of perforation for closure, with or without patch)
• 69620 (Myringoplasty (surgery confined to drumhead and donor area)).

First, let’s analyze the underlying characteristics surrounding codes 69610 and 69620. To begin, the surgeon is performing both for the same underlying purpose — to repair a defect of the eardrum. However, the means in which the surgeon repairs this defect will determine how you code a given surgical report.

“The underlying reason for performing 69610 and 69620 is to repair the tympanic membrane,” says Ronda Tews, CPC, CHC, CCS-P, AAPC Fellow, director of billing and coding compliance at Modernizing Medicine in Boca Raton, Florida. Tews goes on to explain that the extent of work involved in each code is what sets the two apart.

“In addition to the steps included in 69610, 69620 also includes dissolvable packing and a fat graft plug or a piece of fascia being placed medial to the ear drum over the packing. A tympanomeatal flap may be raised and any incisions are sutured and a dressing is applied. You should also note that, when performed, the harvesting of a donor graft is included in the code and not reported separately,” explains Tews.

CPT^® Assistant (April 2015; Volume 25: Issue 4) offers some additional feedback on how you should go about distinguishing between services:

• “If there was preparation of the perforation edges and a water-insoluble, off-white, nonelastic, porous, pliable product was used as a patch to the drum defect, code 69610 would be reported. If tissue graft was harvested and edges prepared for the drum defect repair, then code 69620 would be reported.”

Coder’s note: In most clinical scenarios involving code 69610, you’ll see documentation of either a paper patch or Gelfoam® to repair the perforation. However, keep in mind that some surgical techniques involve the use of both Gelfoam^® and harvested graft tissue (see example 4). 

To further elaborate on these surgeries, have a look at a few operative reports to see if you can pinpoint when and where to report each respective code. 

Code 4 Examples to Drive the Point Home

Example 1: The surgeon performs a right tympanoplasty with a stapes mobilization. Next, the surgeon performs a left Gelfoam^® myringoplasty/repair of tympanic membrane perforation.

Here, you’ve got a straightforward surgical scenario involving a tymanoplasty on the right ear and a myringoplasty on the left ear. As you can see, the myringoplasty does not involve the use of fat harvested tissue to repair the perforation. You’ll report 69631 (Tympanoplasty without mastoidectomy (including canalplasty, atticotomy and/or middle ear surgery), initial or revision; without ossicular chain reconstruction) with modifier RT (Right Side) for the tympanoplasty and 69610 with modifier LT (Left Side) for the myringoplasty.

You’ll notice that a National Correct Coding Initiative (NCCI) edit reveals a modifier “1” indicator between 69631 and 69610. However, the laterality modifiers are all you need to override the bundling edit. An additional overriding modifier, such as modifier 59 (Distinct Procedural Service) is not necessary.

Example 2: The surgeon documents 40 percent anterior inferior perforation of the tympanic membrane of the right ear. The epithelium is removed. The surgeon then excoriates the lateral aspect of the tympanic remnant. She places Gelfoam^® lateral to the perforation with good contact.

This surgical encounter qualifies as 69610 with modifier RT. You’ve got documentation of a routine tympanic membrane repair using Gelfoam^®. Furthermore, the surgeon does not document any use of a harvested tissue graft.

Example 3: The surgeon gently rotates out the left ear tube from the tympanic membrane from the ear canal. He then abrades the undersurface of the perforation with a tab knife. The surgeon then places a sterile paper patch upon the tympanic membrane.

Here, you’ve got another tympanic membrane repair with the use of a paper patch instead of Gelfoam®. You will report 69610 with modifier LT since the surgeon does not document the use of harvested tissue graft.

Example 4: The surgeon gently debrides the margins of the right ear perforation with a Rosen needle. Following this, she places Gelfoam^® pledgets in the middle-ear space to prevent the fat graft from falling medially. Next, she incises the inferior portion of the earlobe and a fat graft was harvested. She closes the wound with a running suture of 6-0 mild chromic. She uses the fat graft to plug the hole in the tympanic membrane in a dumbbell shape fashion. Finally, the surgeon places Gelfoam® pledgets around the perforation to hold the fat graft securely in place.

In this example, you do not want to get thrown off by the surgeon’s use of Gelfoam® to secure the fat graft in place. In some instances, the surgeon may use Gelfoam^®, or a paper patch, in addition to a harvested fat graft as a means of further securing the repair.

Furthermore, you should not consider reporting both 69610 and 69620 because the surgeon relies on a patching technique alongside the placement of the fat graft. An NCCI edits check reveals a modifier indicator of “1” when pairing these codes. With 69610 being the column 2 code, the only instance in which you should use an overriding modifier to separately report 69610 alongside 69620 is when the surgeon performs each service on contralateral ears. When appropriate, you may use modifiers LT and RT to override the NCCI edit. In this example, you will report 69620 with modifier RT.