Otolaryngology Coding Alert

Can't Figure Out Post-Op Procedure Denials?

We'll tell you which modifier will make insurers pay up

Although you may blame payers for frequent denials of postoperative procedures, such as a second radical neck dissection (RND) performed during 38724's global period, sometimes the modifier is the real culprit.

"Some payers have software edits that automatically reject procedures performed when a global period exists," says Tara R. Ritter, appeals coordinator for American Physician Services, which serves multiple ENT, allergy, sinus and head and neck practices in Atlanta. For instance, Blue Cross Blue Shield's system threw out all claims filed during a postoperative period, regardless of modifier, Ritter says. After she contacted the insurer's medical director, the payer corrected its system to recognize modifiers. "If an insurer consistently rejects postoperative claims, check with your provider representative to get the system fixed," she says.

Make sure you use the right modifier to explain how the postoperative procedure relates to the postoperative period, says Jay B. Horowitz, MD, clinical assistant professor of surgery/otolaryngology at Robert Wood Johnson Medical School in New Jersey. "Otherwise, the carrier won't pay the first time that you file," he says.

To determine the correct postoperative procedure modifier, ask "How is the subsequent procedure related to the postoperative period?" Ritter says. When a global period is in effect, you should choose from these modifiers:

  • -58 - Staged or related procedure or service by the same physician during the postoperative period

  • -78 - Return to the operating room for a related procedure during the postoperative period

  • -79 - Unrelated procedure or service by the same physician during the postoperative period.

    But applying the appropriate modifier can prove elusive even to the most experienced otolaryngology coder. So, try your hand at four common otolaryngology examples to avoid appealing additional post-op procedures for incorrect appendages.

    Bilateral RND Follows Unilateral Dissection

    Suppose a patient needs a bilateral neck dissection. Due to the risk involved in the operation, the otolaryn-gologist first performs the RND (38724, Cervical lymphadenectomy [modified radical neck dissection]) on the right side, which has 90 global days. A week later, he performs the contralateral side (38724-LT [Left side]).

    So, how is the second procedure related to the primary procedure's global period? In this scenario, the otolaryn-gologist planned to perform one portion of a procedure at one session and to complete the procedure at a later date, Horowitz says. Because the second resection (38724-LT) was planned at the time of the first resection (38724-RT), the second surgery is a staged procedure, he says. Therefore, you should report the second resection (38724-LT) and append modifier -58 (38724-58-LT).

    Malignancy Needs Additional Excision

    When a surgeon removes a malignancy and the pathology report shows that the excision did not fully remove the growth, otolaryngology coders often wonder how to report the second procedure.

    For instance, an otolaryngologist performs a total unilateral thyroid lobectomy to remove a nodule from a patient's thyroid lobe (60220, Total thyroid lobectomy, unilateral; with or without isthmusectomy), which has a 90-day global period. Although the surgery did not show definitive signs of malignancy, the pathology report returns with invasive follicular thyroid malignancy, which requires additional surgery. Therefore, the patient returns 14 days after the lobectomy for remaining thyroid tissue removal (60260, Thyroidectomy, removal of all remaining thyroid tissue following previous removal of a portion of thyroid).

    In this case, the physician must perform a subsequent procedure. During the original surgery, the doctor did not know a malignancy existed, so he performed conservative treatment, removing less tissue. When the report showed a cancer diagnosis, the surgeon had to perform a more radical procedure. Consequently, you should assign 60260-58 to indicate that the patient needed a more extensive procedure, a thyroidectomy, because the primary operation did not adequately remove the malignancy, Horowitz says.

    Post-Op Hemorrhage Leads to Intervention

    Secondary procedures also occur when postoperative bleeding requires treatment. Procedures such as tonsillectomy and septoplasty often result in hemorrhaging, which in some cases may require treatment in the operating room.

    Consider a 6-year-old patient who has a tonsillectomy (42825, Tonsillectomy, primary or secondary; under age 12), which has 90 postoperative days. Five days after the surgery, the patient bleeds so profusely that the otolaryn-gologist has to control the oral hemorrhaging (42962, Control oropharyngeal hemorrhage, primary or secondary [e.g., post-tonsillectomy]; with secondary surgical intervention) in the operating room.

    Although these procedures are related, they are not staged, Horowitz says. After the original procedure, a complication occurs that necessitates performing another service in the operating room, so you should append modifier -78 to the code for control of oral hemorrhage (42962-78).

    Post Sinus/Septoplasty Patient Needs Debridement

    During the 90-day global period of a septoplasty (30520, Septoplasty or submucous resection, with or without cartilage scoring, contouring or replacement with graft), which the physician performs at the same time as endoscopic sinus surgery, a patient returns to her otolaryn-gologist for sinus debridement (31237, Nasal/sinus endoscopy, surgical; with biopsy, polypectomy or debridement [separate procedure]).

    Because the sinus procedure contains zero postoperative days, without the septoplasty no global period would exist, making a modifier unnecessary for the debridement. In this case, the physician also performed a septoplasty, which creates a postoperative global package. Therefore, you have to ask, "How is the subsequent surgery - the debridement - related to the global period?" Ritter says. In this example, the debridement is unrelated to the procedure that triggered the global package - the septoplasty. Therefore, you should assign 31237-79, she says.

     

  • Other Articles in this issue of

    Otolaryngology Coding Alert

    View All