Orthopedic Coding Alert

You Be the Coder:

Two Surgeons, Distinct Services

Test your coding knowledge. Determine how you would code this situation before looking at the box below for the answer.
Question: If one of our surgeons performs an open reduction with internal fixation (ORIF) on a fractured ulna and another one of our surgeons does the harvesting of the bone graft (but did not assist with the ORIF), should I append modifier -62?

Michigan Subscriber
         Answer: The CPT description for modifier -62 (Two surgeons) states, "When two surgeons work together as primary surgeons performing distinct part(s) of a procedure, each surgeon should report his/her distinct operative work by adding modifier '-62' to the procedure code ... ."
 
In this case, each surgeon acted as the primary surgeon for a component of the total service, one surgeon performing the repair and the other surgeon harvesting the graft.
 
Because each surgeon performed a distinct part of the procedure, each will report 25405 (Repair of nonunion or malunion, radius OR ulna; with autograft [includes obtaining graft]) with modifier -62 appended.
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in Revenue Cycle Insider
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more

Other Articles in this issue of

Orthopedic Coding Alert

View All

Which Codify by AAPC tool is right for you?

Call 844-334-2816 to speak with a Codify by AAPC specialist now.