Orthopedic Coding Alert

Reader Question:

Co-Surgeons

Question: One surgeon from our practice performed an open reduction with internal fixation of a nonunion radius fracture, and removed some hardware. The other surgeon (also from our practice) did the iliac crest bone graft, but did not assist the first orthopedist. How should I code this?

Illinois Subscriber
Answer: This should be reported as a co-surgery, with each surgeon reporting 25405-62 (repair of nonunion or malunion, radius OR ulna; with autograft [includes obtaining graft]; two surgeons). You can also bill for the hardware removal, 20680-62 (removal of implant; deep [e.g., buried wire, pin, screw, metal band, nail, rod or plate]; two surgeons). The problem may be that carriers will request documentation questioning why this procedure was performed by co-surgeons, a situation that is usually reserved for complex surgical procedures, so there may be a struggle for reimbursement. An operative report, and perhaps a letter signed by both physicians indicating the unusual circumstances that led to the co-surgery should assist in reimbursement. But if the carrier has a system that automatically "kicks out" claims for co-surgery for this particular procedure, you will have to appeal the claim anyway. 
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in your eNewsletter
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs*
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more
*CEUs available with select eNewsletters.

Other Articles in this issue of

Orthopedic Coding Alert

View All