Orthopedic Coding Alert

Reader Question:

Billing for a Medicare Patient

Question: Should 20936 and 20937 be billed together with modifier -59? This is a Medicare patient. I dont think it is payable, but the surgeon is insisting that I bill for it.

Missouri Subscriber  
Answer: It appears that your surgeon did two separate grafts from two separate sites during the same operative session, since 20936 (autograft for spine surgery only [includes harvesting the graft]; local [e.g., ribs, spinous process, or laminar fragments] obtained from same incision) differs from 20937 (autograft for spine surgery only [includes harvesting the graft]; morselized [through separate skin or fascial incision]) only in respect to the donor site. The problem here is that 20936 has a status code of B (bundled) on the Medicare fee schedule and is not eligible for separate reimbursement, even with modifier -59 (distinct procedural service) appended. If you need written documentation to offer your physician, contact your area Medicare carrier representative for assistance.
Codify by AAPC
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in Revenue Cycle Insider
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more

Other Articles in this issue of

Orthopedic Coding Alert

View All
Subscribe to newsletter