Orthopedic Coding Alert

Reader Question:

Avoid Undercoding Your Claims

Question: I keep hearing that undercoding is just as dangerous as upcoding, but no one can ever explain why that is. Can you please advise? Texas Subscriber Answer: Incorrectly coding is problematic for many reasons, most of all because you should be able to get paid for all of the services you provide. But in the case of Medicare, undercoding may be seen as inducement, which may then be considered fraud or abuse or both. Medicare considers inducement as "offering any free service to a patient to encourage providing a service that would be covered by Medicare." Specifically, inducement occurs when a provider knows that remuneration offered to Medicare or Medicaid beneficiaries will likely influence the beneficiary to order or receive items or services from the provider. The "should know" standard is met if a provider acts with deliberate ignorance or reckless disregard. Medicare does not require proof of specific intent. The HHS Office of Inspector General considers providing free or discounted goods or services to existing customers who have an ongoing relationship with a provider likely to influence future purchases of covered services by those customers.
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in your eNewsletter
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs*
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more
*CEUs available with select eNewsletters.

Other Articles in this issue of

Orthopedic Coding Alert

View All