Orthopedic Coding Alert

Dispel These 3 Common Spine Coding Myths At the Root of Reduced Reimbursement

Surprise: You can report instrumentation removal during repeat fusions A surgeon performs both posterior and anterior arthrodesis, but the insurer denies 22554 and bundles it into 22600 - and you write off about $675 that Medicare allots for 22554 under the multiple-procedure rule, right? Not so fast. You've just fallen prey to one of the top-three spine coding myths.

The following spine coding scenarios will help you tighten up your claims and give your appeals some muscle. Myth #1: You can't bill instrumentation removal during repeat fusions Suppose your surgeon places segmental instrumentation during a spinal fusion, but a year later the patient returns complaining of severe low back pain, and the surgeon suspects pseudarthrosis.

The surgeon returns the patient to the operating room (OR), removes the instrumentation and explores the fusion mass (22830, Exploration of spinal fusion). The orthopedic surgeon confirms pseudarthrosis and performs a redo fusion.

"Some Medicare carriers say you can't use the instrumentation removal codes with 22830," said Greg Przybylski, MD, professor and director of neurosurgery at the NJ Neuroscience Institute at JFK Medical Center and Seton Hall University, at a May Coding Institute audioconference titled "Eight Stellar Strategies for Spine Surgery Pay-up."

Those Medicare payers are wrong, Przybylski says. "CPT added language in 2005 that states the AMA's position, which is that you can use the instrumentation removal/reinsertion codes with 22830."

The applicable removal/reinsertion codes you should report are:

22849 - Reinsertion of spinal fixation device
22850 - Removal of posterior nonsegmental instrumentation (e.g., Harrington rod)
22852 - Removal of posterior segmental instrumentation
22855 - Removal of anterior instrumentation.

Justification: CPT states, "Report modifier 51 (Multiple procedures) with 22849, 22850, 22852 and 22855 when instrumentation reinsertion or removal is reported with other definitive procedures such as arthrodesis, decompression, and exploration of fusion."

If your insurer continues to deny your instrumentation removal claims when you report spinal fusion, copy the applicable page of CPT (the notation is printed directly above code 22830's descriptor) and send it with your appeal, along with a short letter from the surgeon. Myth #2: You can bill corpectomy with lumbar interbody fusion Your spine surgeon turns in the following operative note:

"I performed a transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion at L4-5, and performed osteotomy anteriorly in the disk space to augment the fusion and posteriorly to facilitate placement of the cages.

"I prepared the end plates and packed autograft bone anteriorly and laterally, then packed 9- x 22-mm cages with cancellous autograft as placed."

Your surgeon recommends that you report the arthrodesis code along with a partial corpectomy (63087, Vertebral corpectomy [vertebral body resection], partial or complete, combined thoracolumbar approach with decompression of spinal cord, cauda equina or nerve root[s], lower thoracic or lumbar; single segment), and your office manager [...]
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in your eNewsletter
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs*
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more
*CEUs available with select eNewsletters.

Other Articles in this issue of

Orthopedic Coding Alert

View All