Ophthalmology and Optometry Coding Alert

Reader Questions:

Look to Face Time When Reporting Established Patient

Question: Our practice performed a visual field test on a patient who was referred to us by another doctor. Our ophthalmologist was not present for the test; a tech performed the test. Should I consider this patient an established patient?California SubscriberAnswer: No, you should consider the patient "new" until a face-to-face encounter with your ophthalmologist occurs. Since the visual field test does not carry a distinction of "new" or "established," the test would be reported as usual. If the patient returned to the office at a future date, the patient would be considered "new" for purposes of billing an E/M code. It would not be appropriate to report an E/M service on the day of the visual field testing since no physician saw the patient. Do not make the mistake of reporting 99211 as this code requires the patient to have been previously evaluated by the physician and the physician [...]
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in your eNewsletter
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs*
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more
*CEUs available with select eNewsletters.

Other Articles in this issue of

Ophthalmology and Optometry Coding Alert

View All