Ophthalmology and Optometry Coding Alert

READER QUESTIONS:

Don't View Rust Rings as Foreign Bodies

Question: Our ophthalmologist removed a rust ring from a patient's central cornea, using a slit lamp and a burr. Would 65400 be the code for removal of the rust ring, or would 65222 be more appropriate?


Massachusetts Subscriber
Answer: Code 65435 (Removal of corneal epithelium; with or without chemocauterization [abrasion, curettage]) is the code that most accurately describes the work being done here. To remove a rust ring, the ophthalmologist uses a burr to scrape away the rust-impregnated corneal epithelium.

Even though the rust ring is a foreign body, don't be tempted to report 65222 (Removal of foreign body, external eye; corneal, with slit lamp) as the most appropriate code. Code 65400 (Excision of lesion, cornea [keratectomy, lamellar, partial], except pterygium) is also not appropriate since the ophthalmologist is removing a foreign body, not a lesion.

Don't forget to append the proper modifier--LT (Left side) or RT (Right side)--to specify which eye the ophthalmologist worked on.
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in Revenue Cycle Insider
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more

Other Articles in this issue of

Ophthalmology and Optometry Coding Alert

View All