Ophthalmology and Optometry Coding Alert

Reader questions:

92225 Done Twice May Need Different Dxs

Question: Could you shed some light on billing 92225 or 92226 with modifier 50, RT/LT, or two units for a newborn who is in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU)? How do you determine medical necessity for billing twice? Answer: Both 92225 (Ophthalmoscopy, extended, with retinal drawing [e.g., for retinal detachment, melanoma], with interpretation and report; initial) and 92226 (... subsequent) are inherently unilateral, so you can get reimbursement for extended opthalmoscopies (EOs) performed on both eyes provided the ophthalmologist shows medical necessity for both. You must report ICD-9 codes illustrating medical necessity for each eye. Don't assume that both eyes have the same diagnosis. Consult your insurer's policy for diagnosis codes that support medical necessity. Always code diagnoses based on the MD's documentation. The range of accepted codes is pretty wide. For instance, insurers may accept 362.83 (Retinal edema) and 377.00 (Papilledema, unspecified) to prove medical necessity for an [...]
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in Revenue Cycle Insider
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more

Other Articles in this issue of

Ophthalmology and Optometry Coding Alert

View All