Carol Conerly, Office Manager
Kebert Eye Clinic
McComb, Miss.
Answer: Modifier -26 (professional component), which is for the professional, or physician, component (as against the technical or ultrasound component) should never be used with 92012. The eye exam doesnt split professional and technical components; 92012 is a stand-alone code. Medicare is probably rejecting this charge either because it does not recognize 92012 with the -26 modifier appended or because the visit is being billed inside the global period of the first eye.
Medicare considers that if the second eye is done in the global period of the first eye, the initial determination to do the second eye was made at the same time as the first eye determination. Therefore, the examination is denied for the second eye because it is considered the preoperative examination portion of the global package for the second eye.
For the ultrasound itself, however, the modifier -26 is appropriate. Thats because 76519 has a technical and a professional component. When the A-scan was done on the first eye, the ophthalmologist could bill the global 76519 for the technical and the
professional component.
For the second eye calculation done within a year of the measurements, however, the technical portionthe A-scanwas already performed. You would only bill for the professional component. Billing 76519 would indeed reduce your fee because you are only being paid for the professional service of determining the power and style of IOL implant. Medicare would pay about $29 for 76519-26. For 76519, both components, Medicare reimburses approximately $76.
Tip: Try attaching the eye modifiers, -RT and -LT, to the A-scan codes so Medicare understands that the second eye is being billed.
Sources for Answers: Sue Vicchrilli, COT, ophthalmic coding specialist, American Academy of Ophthalmology; Lise Roberts, vice president, Health Care Compliance Strategies.