Ophthalmology and Optometry Coding Alert
Reader Question:
375.15 and 370.21 Are Distinguishable by Condition
Published on Mon May 27, 2013
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
Other Articles in this issue of
Ophthalmology and Optometry Coding Alert
- Cataract Surgery:
3 Scenarios Help Focus Your Cataract Coding
Tip: You can code vitrectomies separately — sometimes. With several possible surgical treatments for cataract [...] - Gonioscopy:
92020 FAQ: Watch Bilateral Status, Diagnoses for Gonioscopy
There may only be one gonioscopy code, but there are several ways you can sabotage [...] - Billing:
3 Tips Clean Up Your Incident-To Billing
Steer clear of 2013 OIG Work Plan scrutiny. If your ophthalmology practice utilizes non-physician practitioners [...] - You Be the Coder:
Bleb Needling
Question: My ophthalmologist performed a needling procedure during the postoperative period of a trabeculectomy to [...] - Reader Question:
Code Only Finished Procedure in Abandoned Photocoagulation
Question: After discussing the risks and benefits of both cryotherapy and photocoagulation for a retinal [...] - Reader Question:
Wait Until Oct. 1, 2014, to Use ICD-10
Question: Our practice is considering submitting claims with ICD-10 codes before the implementation date in [...] - Reader Question:
375.15 and 370.21 Are Distinguishable by Condition
Question: Can 375.15 and 370.21 be used interchangeably? When would one be the preferred diagnosis [...]
View All
