Oncology & Hematology Coding Alert

You Be the Coder:

Tackle Second-Opinion Troubles

Question: A local oncologist (not in our practice) recommended IMRT for his patient. But before the patient's insurer would approve the treatment, the payer asked our physician to conduct a physical examination of the patient.

We-d like to report 99243 for this service, but that's what the first oncologist reported. Will the insurer reject our claim as double-billing?


Arizona Subscriber 


Answer: The insurer might reject your claim for the consult, unless you append modifier 32 (Mandated services) to 99243 (Office consultation for a new or established patient ...).

Modifier 32 signals the carrier that the payer requested the consult and that the service is therefore not a redundant claim. The modifier generally describes procedures or services required by a third-party payer or a governmental or legislative agency.

Note: Medicare doesn't reimburse for second- opinion exams you report with modifier 32 because another insurance company requires the exam. The insurer requesting the second opinion should make payment under the terms of its policy.
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in Revenue Cycle Insider
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more

Other Articles in this issue of

Oncology & Hematology Coding Alert

View All