If you thought you couldn't get paid for multiple radiation treatments on the same day, think again. Radiation oncology coders can now report multiple radiation treatment sessions (77401-77416) on the same day as long as coders adhere to the new Medicare guidelines. Look at the 'Nature of the Services' Although CMS does not define "completely different sessions," most Medicare carriers agree that your oncologist must maintain a six-hour break between the radiation treatments. In addition, the patient's medical record must clearly document the medical necessity of separate session scheduling (also referred to as "BID" or "hyperfractioning"). Empire Medicare's (the Part A carrier for New York, Massachusetts, Delaware and Connecticut) policy echoes most others' when it states that the individual sessions must be "of the character usually furnished on different days." Use Examples to Clarify the Issue Example 1: Suppose your radiation oncologist administers complex portal arrangements via photons using 11-MeV radiation to each of the three separate treatment areas. These are your options:
An April 2 CMS Program Memorandum (PM) A-03-020 states, "Codes 77401 through 77416 may be reported more than once per date of service only when radiation treatment is provided during completely different sessions. Only one of these codes may be reported for each treatment session no matter how many areas are treated or no matter how much radiation is delivered."
This PM corrected CMS' Jan. 3 transmittal (A-02-129), which instructed radiation oncology coders to report these codes only once per date of service.
"You have to look at the nature of the radiation services," says Deborah I. Churchill, RTT, president of Churchill Consulting Inc., a Killingworth, Conn., consulting firm that offers audits, seminars and electronic coding applications. For you to bill two radiation treatment codes, the separate sessions have to be of the type of services that your oncologist would normally perform on different days, she says.
Suppose your physician treats a patient in the morning with two separate areas, Churchill says. "This constitutes only one treatment delivery code because you would normally address both of these areas during one session."
In other words, if your radiation oncologist administers two unique treatments to the patient on the same day, you should report two separate treatment encounters using the appropriate code(s). For example, "If a patient had a head or neck cancer, such as T1 cancer of the larynx (161.0-161.9), we might administer a lower-than-normal dosage of radiation to the patient, but we do that twice a day," says Diane Corder, RTT, facility administrator at Gwinnett County Radiation Therapy Center in Lawrenceville, Ga. "The per-treatment dosage is lower, but the overall dosage is higher than normal. The one caveat that the insurer requires is that we allow a minimum of six hours between therapies so the normal cells can recuperate." If your physician meets those requirements, you can report both codes on the same date.
Churchill agrees. "The standard 'BID' break, based on utilization guidelines, is approximately six hours." This technique is generally applicable when treating the following conditions:
To select the appropriate radiation treatment code, you should first determine how many areas your radiation oncologist treated. " 'Area' refers to the total volume within the body to which the radiation therapy is directed," Churchill says. If your oncologist treats the breast with tangent fields and the supraclav, that is still considered one area. Code 77401 refers to a superficial delivery, 77402-77406 refer to a single treatment area, 77407-77411 refer to two separate treatment areas, and 77412-77416 refer to treatment to three or more areas.
Use two factors when you determine the treatment delivery level: energy and the treatment's complexity based on the number of volumes and beam-modifying devices, Churchill adds. Immobilization is not a determinant in the daily treatment level, he says, but you always consider electrons a complex level. If you report volumes that your physician treated with two energies, insurers require that you should always report the single highest energy used.
A. Report one unit of 77414 (Radiation treatment delivery ... 11-19 MeV) to denote the complete radiation treatment session.
B. Report three units of 77414 to signify the three treatment areas to which your oncologist delivered 11 MeV.
C. Report one unit of 77412 ( three or more separate treatment areas ...; up to 5 MeV), one unit of 77413 ( 6-10 MeV) and one unit of 77414 to achieve the total 33 MeV administered.
The answer is A. Because your oncologist administered the radiation to all three treatment areas during one session and not during "completely different" sessions, you should report only one unit of 77414.
Example 2: Suppose your radiation oncologist administers 6 MeV to a patient's neck using a custom shielding technique at 7 a.m. At 4 p.m. on the same day, he or she administers an additional photon treatment at 6 MeV to the patient's neck using a smaller open-portal arrangement. Which of the following codes should
you report?
A. One unit of 77404 ( 11-19 MeV) because your oncologist combined the initial 6-MeV dosage to the second 6 MeV on a single treatment area, thus totaling 12 MeV.
B. One unit of 77413 for the morning session and one unit of 77403 for the afternoon, both based on the energy and beam-modifying devices used for each of the two separate sessions
C. Two units of 77408 to represent two separate sessions of 6-MeV radiation treatment administered to two treatment areas.
The answer is B. Because your radiation oncologist maintained a six-hour break and he or she performed the type of service that he or she would normally perform on separate days, you can consider each session independently and report your physician's services based on the energy and complexity of the treatment. You would report 77413 (because of the complex blocking) for the morning session and 77403 (single area open portals) for the afternoon session at the appropriate energy levels. In addition, you should not "add up" the amount of energy your oncologist administered (as was the case in option "A") to total a higher level of MeV than your machine is capable of delivering, because this is incorrect coding.