Oncology & Hematology Coding Alert

Reader Question:

'Seen and Agree' Won't Withstand Audit

Question: Our physician works with residents each year. It's very time consuming, but he does review their documentation and indicates whether he agrees with their findings. He doesn't use a rubber stamp. Instead, he actually writes "Seen and agreed" on the chart before he signs it. A consultant told us during an audit that documenting this way is unacceptable. Can you explain the problem?California SubscriberAnswer:  The consultant is correct. Although you're correct that a "seen and agreed" rubber stamp is unacceptable, CMS says a handwritten note of the same phrase is also a no-go.Explanation: "Seen and agree" followed by a legible countersignature or identity is an example of unacceptable documentation, according to CMS's Medicare Claims Processing Manual, chapter 12, section 100.1.1 (www.cms.gov/manuals/downloads/clm104c12.pdf). Other examples of what CMS considers unacceptable teaching physician documentation include, "Rounded, reviewed, agree" and "Discussed with resident. Agree."Better way: The manual offers illustrations of acceptable documentation. [...]
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in Revenue Cycle Insider
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more

Other Articles in this issue of

Oncology & Hematology Coding Alert

View All