Oncology & Hematology Coding Alert

News You Can Use:

Keep Signature, Modifier 59, and 'Incident To' Guidelines Front and Center

2 compliance updates keep your coding in the clear. If you've been worrying that the oncologist's illegible signature on an order is going to come back to haunt your practice in an audit, CMS has offered answers on when you're safe and when that untidy scrawl could have reviewers requesting additional information. 1. Get Signature Guidelines Down Pat With few exceptions, Medicare requires a signaturefor services and orders. CMS updated the rules and added e-prescribing language to the mix in Transmittal 327, CR6698 (www.cms.gov/transmittals/downloads/R327PI.pdf). The rules instruct contractors reviewing claims on what counts as a signature and when the services or orders must have signatures. One important exception to the signature requirement is that "diagnostic orders need not be signed by the physician," says Kelly Loya, CPC-I, CPhT, consultant with California-based Sinaiko Healthcare Consulting Inc. Still, the medical record must include information verifying the ordering physician intended the test [...]
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in Revenue Cycle Insider
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more