Oncology & Hematology Coding Alert

Incident-Toand NPP Billing

Most oncology practices can bill many more nonphysician practitioner services than they think, so now's the time to brush up on the incident-to how-to's. Practices can bill NPP services as either incident-to a physician or under the NPP's own provider number, so practices need to decide which method works best for them. Too many practices reduce this to a simple economic equation. They see that incident-to services are reimbursed at 100 percent of the Physician Fee Schedule and that NPP services get 85 percent. But there's more to it than simple math, experts warn. Coders and NPPs need to make sure they follow the rules when billing for services incident-to the physician.

"The biggest problem with incident-to billing is that people aren't aware of the documentation requirement for the supervision component," says Carol Pohlig, BSN, RN, CPC, reimbursement analyst for the University of Pennsylvania. To bill a service incident-to, you need physician supervision from somewhere in the office space. To document this, Pohlig explains, you need at least a simple phrase in the progress notes such as "performed under the supervision of Dr. X," or "service provided under supervision of Dr. X." It's a relatively simple thing to do, but "a lot of people fail to do that," Pohlig says. New Patients and New Problems Aren't 'Incidental' New patients and, more important, established patients with new problems add another monkey wrench to the incident-to machine. To bill NPP services incident-to a physician, you must provide the services to an established patient with an established plan of care. If an NPP sees a patient for any other reason, the service must be billed under the NPP's provider number. Busy practices make critical mistakes in this area, especially when they're swamped with patients, said Emily Hill, PA-C, president of Hill & Associates in Wilmington, N.C., at a recent Coding Institute teleconference. The NPP will see patient after patient and bill incident-to the physician since these are patients who have been seen by the doctor at some point either today or in the past for the same problem that they're in for today. That's fine, Hill said. But practices run into trouble when the NPP sees a new patient, or a patient who is presenting with a new problem for which he has not seen a physician. When this happens, the NPP can treat the patient but must bill under his own provider number. The NPP cannot bill incident-to the physician for new patients or for old patients with new problems. The NPP or the practice biller must make clear when he is seeing a patient incident-to the physician and when he is seeing a patient under his own provider number.

"It can [...]
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in Revenue Cycle Insider
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more