Oncology & Hematology Coding Alert

Focus on the Details to Choose Between 99213 and 99214

Never assume certain cancer diagnoses merit high-level E/Ms

You-re more likely to report CPT 99213 and 99214 than other established patient E/M codes, but watch out. Payers audit 99214 more than any other E/M code. Follow our tips to determine when you can bump your visit up to 99214 and when you should stay in the 99213 zone. Nail Down 99213 and 99214 Elements Pay attention to the differences in the descriptors for 99213 and 99214:

- 99213--Office or other outpatient visit for the evaluation and management of an established patient, which requires at least two of these three key components: an expanded problem-focused history; an expanded problem-focused examination; medical decision-making of low complexity. Counseling and/or coordination of care with other providers or agencies are provided consistent with the nature of the problem(s) and the patient's and/or family's needs.

Usually the presenting problem(s) are of low to moderate severity. Physicians typically spend 15 minutes face-to-face with the patient and/or family.

- 99214--- a detailed history; a detailed examination; medical decision-making of moderate complexity. Counseling and/or coordination of care with other providers or agencies are provided consistent with the nature of the problem(s) and the patient's and/or family's needs. Usually the presenting problem(s) are of moderate to high severity. Physicians typically spend 25 minutes face-to-face with the patient and/or family. You can successfully code and document level-four established patient office visits (99214) for many of your oncology patients by remembering the code's minimum criteria. Compare 99213's to 99214's 1995 E/M documentation guidelines.

Watch These Common Upcoding Mistakes If your oncologist's documentation supports a level-four visit, you should report 99214. But watch out for these hidden traps:

1. To count as a component of your documentation, the history must be pertinent to the patient's current condition. Just because a patient marks on her intake sheet that she had hand surgery in the past doesn't mean that you can count that as an additional system review, unless the condition is pertinent to her cancer diagnosis.

Payers and auditors may view obtaining a higher-level component than medically necessary just to charge a higher-level E/M service as -gaming the system,- says Barbara J. Cobuzzi, MBA, CPC, CPC-H, CHBME, president of CRN Healthcare Solutions in Tinton Falls, N.J.

2. -Oncology MDM [medical decision-making] can be more intricate or complex than other specialties,- says Beth Potratz, CPC-A, with the Cancer Treatment Center in Swansea, Ill.

But remember that E/M codes aren't diagnosis-driven, she says. Don't assume you can report higher-level E/M codes for oncology patients--base your E/M choice on the documentation.

Example: An established female patient with a primary neoplasm of the lower-inner quadrant of the breast (174.3, Malignant neoplasm of female breast; lower-inner quadrant) comes to the office. You know this case has [...]
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in Revenue Cycle Insider
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more

Other Articles in this issue of

Oncology & Hematology Coding Alert

View All