Remember, what used to be a consultation is now likely a 99201-99215 service. Suppose the oncologist provides a new patient with a standard office-visit E/M. You mistakenly use an established patient E/M to code the encounter. No big deal, right? Wrong -- Not only is the coding incorrect, but this mistake will cost your practice deserved reimbursement. Further, Medicare's deletion of consultation codes means that coders will have to answer the new vs. established question more often than before. For Medicare payers, and payers that follow their lead, coders now have to "select the correct code, new or established, to bill for what used to be consults and did not have a new versus established component concept," relays Quinten A. Buechner, M.S., M.Div., AAPC:CPC, BMSC:ACS-FP/GI/PEDS, ACMCS:PCS, PHIA:CCP, PAHCS:CMSCS, president of ProActive Consultants in Cumberland, Wis. Nail the patient's status every time by following this expert advice on new and established patients. Ignore New Patient E/M, Leave Money on the Table The difference between new and established patient E/M reimbursement is no small matter. Consider this comparison of average national payouts for new and established level-five E/M codes, respectively: That's approximately $60 lost revenue if you mistakenly report 99215 instead of 99205. Note: Ask 3-Year Question First If your patient has had a face-to-face service with the oncologist (or another physician with the same specialty credentials in your group) within the last three years, then the patient is established, confirms Kami Culb, office coordinator at Frederick Memorial Hospital Immediate Care in Frederick, Md. So let's say a patient reports to the oncologist for a levelthree E/M service on April 20, 2010. The patient's record indicates that she received a face-to-face E/M service from the oncologist on Dec. 14, 2008. This is an established patient, so you should report 99213 (... an expanded problem focused history; an expanded problem focused examination; medical decision making of low complexity ...). Face Time a Must for Established Patients What does a coder do when the patient has received treatment from the oncologist within the last three years, but the physician did not actually lay eyes on the patient? This is a different coding situation, says Shelby Davidson, CPC, CMSCS, coding educator at OHMFS in Ohio. Do this: This means that you might be able to report a patient as new if the oncologist provided services for the patient less than three years ago -- provided it was not a face-to-face-service. Example: A patient reports to the oncologist for an E/M service. The patient's record indicates that the oncologist read the results of the patient's lab test on May 5, 2009. There was no record of a face-to-face service. You should choose a new patient E/M code for this encounter (99201-99205). Explanation: Check Specialty When Deciding Status Coders that work in multispecialty practices will have to pay attention to one more new/established patient status rule, says Cathy Satkus, CPC, coder for Harvard Family Physicians in Tulsa, Okla. Example: The patient's medical record indicates that he received a covered screening colonoscopy from Dr. G, the practice's gastroenterologist, a year ago but has not seen the oncologist or any other oncologist within the practice in the past three years. You would code this as a new patient because the specialty is different, Satkus says. Tip: