Do not assume EMRs are flawless. Documentation compliance is as important as coding accuracy when it comes to facing an audit by the payer. Complete and clear documentation can go a long way to save you from potential denials or fines. You can adopt some simple rules to ensure your provider documentation can face a payer or government scrutiny at any time. 1. Start with Authentication Requirements Every medical record must have authentication. Every service your medical staff provides or orders should be authenticated by the author. All notes should be dated, preferably timed, and signed by the author. Authentication must have either a handwritten or an electronic signature. Note that signature stamps are not acceptable for Medicare and many other payers. Initials are acceptable as long as they clearly identify the author, such as the initials are written over the provider’s printed name or a signature log exists and is provided to support the initials to a specific provider. See Medicare Program Integrity Manual, Chapter 3, Section 3.3.2.4. Handwritten signatures are considered a “mark or sign.” If the signature is illegible, Medicare shall consider evidence in a signature log. Lack of such supporting documentation will result in claims denial. Remember: Every note must stand alone, meaning that the performed services must be documented at the onset. The medical record must stand on its own with the original entry corroborating that the service was rendered and medically necessary. Ensure legibility: Every entry in a patient’s medical record must be legible to another reader to a degree that a meaningful review may be conducted. If the signature is not legible and does not identify the author, a printed version should also be recorded. 2. Check Timing Requirements When your providers actually complete their documentation matters. Documentation should be generated at the time of service or, as Medicare puts it, “shortly thereafter.” Delayed entries within a “reasonable” period of time are acceptable for the purposes of: Rule of thumb: Payers don’t typically give a set timeframe on what qualifies as “shortly thereafter,” experts say. The rule is usually that you are in good shape as long as the documentation is in the chart and documented in the time that the author has “total recall” of the patient encounter or service. 3. Be Careful Making Alterations The medical record cannot and should not be altered. Errors must be legibly corrected so that the reviewer can draw an inference to its origin. If your provider makes a correction, he should include the date and (preferably) the time of the amendment as a late entry. Then, the person making the change should also legibly sign or initial the entry. Example: Your provider accidently copies and pastes a sentence from one patient’s record into another patient’s record. Someone in your practice catches the error later on. “Even if you realize that you put it on the wrong patient’s record or that that comment is totally inappropriate for that particular patient, then it should not be taken out of the record, but corrected using an appropriate method such as lining through it and initialing above it and the date [added and a statement] to say that was an error.” Be clear: Delayed written additions/explanations serve for clarification only and cannot be used to add and authenticate services billed and not documented at the time of service or to retrospectively substantiate medical necessity. For example, if your practice did an audit and found that one of your providers was billing based on time but never included the total time spent with the patient in the chart notes, you cannot go back later and add the time to support the billing. 4. Know the Rules for Using Scribes If a “scribe” is documenting for the provider, the individual writing the note or entry in the medical record should note “written by (name of NPP), acting as a scribe for Dr. (Physician Name).” The physician should then co-sign and date the record, and also indicate that the note accurately reflects work and decisions he made and as scribed during the encounter. 5. Watch Out for EMR Pitfalls With the introduction of electronic medical records (EMRs) the capability of “carry over,” repetitive “fill ins,” and note cloning has become prevalent, experts say. Remind your providers — and coding/billing staff — that only medically necessary information is considered when you are deciding on the code to bill based on supporting documentation. Copy/paste, cloning, and the act of carrying information forward from another record or another portion of the record have the same effect on the integrity of the medical record. “With consistent and overuse of copy/paste, a documentation mistake can be almost unavoidable. Errors seen most often seen in audits and are most concerning are contradictions of fact in a patient’s record, which is a risk in, and of itself,” says Kelly C. Loya, CPC-I, CHC, CPhT, CRMA, associate partner, Pinnacle Enterprise Risk Consulting Services LLC. Bottom line: Cloning of documentation is considered a misrepresentation of the medical necessity requirement for coverage of services. Credibility of the record is compromised and an auditor will be unable to determine what is accurate and how much work was done on one visit versus how it compares to others.