Ob-Gyn Coding Alert

You Be the Coder:

Transvaginal Ultrasound

Test your coding knowledge. Determine how you would code this situation before looking at the box below for the
answer.

Question: A patient was recently in our ob practice for a routine exam, and our certified nurse midwife (CNM) performed a transvaginal ultrasound. There were potential problems, so the CNM sent the patient to an imaging center for limited ultrasound to confirm or eliminate the possibility of the problem. The imaging center told us we could not bill for the transvaginal ultrasound because only one diagnostic service of this nature can be billed for a patient per day. Is this correct?

Arkansas Subscriber

 


Answer: There is no reason why your CNM and the radiologist cannot bill both ultrasound services. In some cases, the Correct Coding Initiative disallows specific codes reported on the same day. These apply to mutually exclusive procedures, which are those that cannot be performed during the same operative session, and comprehensive and component procedures, which are not reimbursed when the practitioner provides the component procedure on the same date as the comprehensive service.

Transvaginal (76830, Ultrasound, transvaginal) and limited transabdominal ultrasounds (76815, Ultrasound, pregnant uterus, B-scan and/or real time with image documentation; limited [fetal size, heart beat, placental location, fetal position, or emergency in the delivery room]) do not fall into either category, however, and both may be coded and billed. Some insurers may require that you append modifier -59 (Distinct procedural service) to the transvaginal code to indicate that the service is not a component of another procedure. But this may not help you if the payer's written policy stipulates that only one diagnostic service is payable per patient per day (regardless of the healthcare provider's opinion). If this is the case, you may want to consider having the limited ultrasound done the next day, assuming a one-day delay will not harm the patient.


Other Articles in this issue of

Ob-Gyn Coding Alert

View All