Ob-Gyn Coding Alert

Reader Questions:

Pick Dx Based on Exposure Versus Results

Question: A pregnant patient has tested positive for Parvo. Our ob-gyn ordered a biophysical profile (76819) and applied a diagnosis of 796.4. Wouldn't 655.4x be  more appropriate?

Texas Subscriber Answer: You're right. Because she tested positive for Parvo, you should use the much more specific code 655.4x (Suspected damage to fetus from other disease in the mother) rather than 796.4 (Other abnormal clinical
findings). The more specific code suits this situation because you are testing the fetus for possible damage; you are not testing the mother for Parvo or its effects. You can use 796.4 as the secondary diagnosis, but it isn't mandatory that you do so.
 
If she had been exposed to Parvo but you don't know the test results yet, your diagnosis code would be 648.93 (Other current conditions classifiable elsewhere, but complicating pregnancy; antepartum condition or complication) plus V01.79 (Other viral diseases). Remember, you should always sequence the ob code first on the claim.
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in your eNewsletter
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs*
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more
*CEUs available with select eNewsletters.

Other Articles in this issue of

Ob-Gyn Coding Alert

View All