Ob-Gyn Coding Alert
Reader Question:
Include Cautery In This Situation
Published on Fri Feb 07, 2014
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
- Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
- Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
- Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
- Instant access to every article ever published in Revenue Cycle Insider
- 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs
- The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more
Other Articles in this issue of
Ob-Gyn Coding Alert
- CCI 20.0:
New Codes 49406 and 49407 Among Non-Mutually Exclusive Edits You Must Implement Now
Bonus: Find out if you will get paid for this non-face-to-face service. Every Jan. 1 [...] - CCI 20.0:
Highlight Mutually Exclusive Edits Added to New CPT® Codes 10030 and 49407
Tip: Make certain you understand what “mutually exclusive” really means. The codes for excision of [...] - ICD-10:
Preterm Labor Codes 644.00 And 644.03 Transition to New O60.0- Options
Don’t overlook these Includes notes. Preterm labor is labor that begins more than three weeks [...] - You Be the Coder:
Determine if Uterine Replacement Happened Before or After Delivery
Question: The patient delivered vaginally (59400) and then had a complication, which required a uterine [...] - News You Can Use:
Congress Saves Your Pay From Drastic Cuts - For Now
Hope for SGR fix before April 1. If you were braced for your Medicare reimbursement [...] - Reader Question:
Include Cautery In This Situation
Question: My ob-gyn documented the following: “Patient had surgery for pelvic pain, evidence of hemoperitoneum, [...] - Reader Question:
Tackle This Hysteroscope With Retained Products of Conception Scenario
Question: We billed a 59820 – DX 632. The patient was still bleeding, so we [...] - Reader Question:
Clarify Correct Coding for BPP of Twin Ultrasounds
Question: My ultrasound tech scanned a patient with a twin pregnancy. The patient is 31.5 [...] - Reader Question:
Demystify Modifier 50 with 58661
Question: Does anyone bill 58661 with modifier 50 and get paid? Medicare used to consider [...] - Reader Question:
Wait to Report High BP Reading Until Billing Global Service
Question: We have a patient pregnant with twins whose BP readings at her second prenatal [...]
View All
