Ob-Gyn Coding Alert

Reader Question:

Double IUD Insertions Doesn't Mean Extra Dough

Question: One of our physicians inserted an IUD, but it did not drop into the uterus, so she inserted another system. How should I code this? She wants me to use 58300 twice with modifier 53 on one. Is this correct?


North Dakota Subscriber
Answer: You-ll only use modifier 53 (Discontinued procedure) when you code procedures that require surgical preparation and anesthesia, and the ob-gyn stops the entire procedure before repeating. Modifier 52 (Reduced service) represents a failed procedure, but your payer will hardly believe that the ob-gyn failed and then succeeded with an intrauterine device (IUD) insertion. To be paid for two insertions on the same day is highly unlikely. The payer will question why the first insertion failed. Did the physician not get it in correctly? Did the patient's anatomy cause it to fail? You could possibly use modifier 22 (Unusual procedural services) with 58300 (Insertion of intrauterine device [IUD]), but don't hold your breath on receiving extra reimbursement because this is unlikely as well. So you-ll likely have to resort to only one unit of 58300.
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in Revenue Cycle Insider
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more

Other Articles in this issue of

Ob-Gyn Coding Alert

View All

Which Codify by AAPC tool is right for you?

Call 844-334-2816 to speak with a Codify by AAPC specialist now.