Advanced Search

Ob-Gyn Coding Alert

Reader Question:

Count Hemostasis As Part of Procedure

Published on Thu Oct 12, 2017

You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.

Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:

Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
Instant access to every article ever published in Revenue Cycle Insider
6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs
The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more

Related Articles

Modifiers: 4 Tips Simplify How You Should Use Modifier 62

Reader Question: Distinguish Between Your PCPs and Ob-Gyns Before Using O Codes

Reader Question: No Need for Ob-Gyn's Presence on TC/26 Code

Other Articles in this issue of

Ob-Gyn Coding Alert

CPT® 2018 Update:
Focus on 5 CPT® 2018 Features to Fortify Your Future Ob-Gyn Claims
Again, you need to update how you report flu vaccines. Although CPT® 2018 doesn't bring [...]

Coding Quiz:
Elevate Your E/M Coding Expertise By Tackling These 2 Ob-Gyn Scenarios
Higher level E/M codes means more intense documentation requirements. Before you apply a high-level new [...]

MPFS 2018:
MPFS Targets Telehealth Coding Next Year
Follow proposed Physician Fee Schedule insights for these services. You should expect expanded coverage for [...]

Coding Quiz Answers:
Advance Your E/M Skills by Putting Your Answers to the Test
Check out these three options for Scenario 2. After you've read the scenarios carefully on [...]

You Be the Coder:
Surgical Complication Means Appending This Modifier
Question: My ob-gyn had a weekend call. Patient had a laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy (58541) by a [...]

Reader Question:
Count Hemostasis As Part of Procedure
Question: Patient is one day post-op for 58548 (Laparoscopy, surgical, with radical hysterectomy, with bilateral total [...]

Reader Question:
Yes, You Do Need to Think in ICD-10 Codes
Question: I've never really gotten comfortable with ICD-10 and often find myself coding ICD-9 in my [...]

Reader Question:
Broken Toes Don't Mean Pregnancy Complications
Question: My ob-gyn saw a pregnant patient who broke her toe. What diagnosis should I use? [...]

View All

Which Codify by AAPC tool is right for you?

Call 844-334-2816 to speak with a Codify by AAPC specialist now.