Ob-Gyn Coding Alert
Reader Question:
Control of Bleeding May Not Mean Extra Payment
Published on Wed Apr 13, 2016
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
Related Articles
Other Articles in this issue of
Ob-Gyn Coding Alert
- CCI 22.1:
Highlight These Fibroid Removal, Myomectomy, Colporrhaphy Edits To Avoid Denials
You can potentially appeal denials you received for this revision. April brings more than May [...] - ICD-10 Coding Quiz:
Validate How You Report Z Codes With This 7 Question Challenge
Find out if a Z code can be a primary diagnosis. The Z codes are [...] - Practice Management:
Monitor Claims to Max Out Your Ob-Gyn's Pay
Keep your AR up-to-date. You’re up-to-date on coding changes, you’ve educated your ob-gyns about new [...] - Reader Question:
Use Autologous Dx for Blood Cord Collections
Question: My ob-gyn saw a patient who had a normal spontaneous vaginal delivery over midline episiotomy. [...] - Reader Question:
No Layered Repair? Then Strike "Complex" from Your Options
Question: My ob-gyn performed an episiotomy revision in the office 8 months after the delivery. His [...] - Reader Question:
Can You Choose E/M Code Based on Time Alone? Find Out
Question: If the ob-gyn documents: “Time spent in the evaluation of the patient with mostly medical [...] - Reader Question:
Control of Bleeding May Not Mean Extra Payment
Question: The ob-gyn performed a LAVH with BSO (uterine weight of 270 grams); the hysterectomy was [...] - Reader Question:
Code Descrip Includes Minimum Attending Ob Visits
Question: One of our practice’s Fellows sees an ob patient for, say, six prenatal visits. I [...] - You Be the Coder:
Go Further In-Depth for This Repeat Pap Scenario
Question: On page 30 in the “Validate This Repeat Pap Plus UTI Scenario” (Ob-Gyn Coding Alert [...]
View All
