Ob-Gyn Coding Alert

Reader Question:

Code Sonogram With Positive Pregnancy Test

Question: A new 16-year-old patient had a positive pregnancy test at home. She came in with complaints of spotting for three days, but the spotting stopped two days before the visit. The gynecologist did not document any other history in the note for this visit. The exam covered her heart, chest, abdomen and pelvic area. He performed a pelvic sonogram and determined that there was no intrauterine pregnancy (IUP). The diagnosis was "threatened abortion ... rule out ectopic pregnancy." He advised the patient to return for a follow-up visit in one week to repeat the scan. What level E/M code should I use? Is the sonogram billed in addition to the visit? Illinois Subscriber Answer: In this case, you can report both an E/M service and the sonogram. You should determine the level of new patient visit based on the physician's documentation of the three key components: history, examination and medical decision-making. The lowest level of any one of these three components will determine the service level you can report. In this case, you have a brief history of present illness (HPI) that outlines quality, duration and severity. If you count the information about the positive home pregnancy test as a review of one system, the documentation supports an expanded problem-focused history. Counting the pregnancy test as part of the HPI or past history would mean that the history level drops to problem-focused. Assigning the level of examination is more problematic using the information you have supplied. Under the 1997 E/M guidelines, you have the three known exam elements of heart, lungs and abdomen. The pelvic exam is an unknown because up to 11 elements can be examined (such as external genitalia, uterus, adnexa, perineum, urethra, bladder, etc.). Under the 1997 rules, a problem-focused exam is the documentation of one to five exam elements, an expanded problem-focused exam involves six to 11 exam elements, and a detailed exam would be 12 or more exam elements. The exam you have cited above would not qualify for a comprehensive examination.

Under the 1995 guidelines, the physician performed more than a problem-focused exam. Minimally, the physician examined the affected system (the genital system) and three additional body areas. Therefore, your starting point would be an expanded problem-focused examination, which involves a limited exam of the affected area, plus two to seven additional body areas or organ systems. Alimited exam of the genital system would include only some of the structures. For instance, documenting only external genitalia, vagina and cervix would constitute a limited exam. To move up to a detailed examination, the doctor would have to extend the pelvic exam that is, examine all structures. As for determining the level of medical decision-making, [...]
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in Revenue Cycle Insider
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more

Other Articles in this issue of

Ob-Gyn Coding Alert

View All