Ob-Gyn Coding Alert

Medicare will still accept modifier 59, but use the new modifiers instead when applicable.

Popularity can be a great thing — unless the OIG is watching. That’s when you don’t want to run with the crowd. Such has been the case with modifier 59, which CMS describes as “the most widely used HCPCS modifier,” and intends to stop that by introducing four modifiers to take its place in specific circumstances.

Rationale: “In an effort to reduce inappropriate claim payments due to incorrect use of modifier 59, CMS will roll out these new HCPCS modifiers to describe specific circumstances when it is appropriate to override a CCI edit,” says Heidi Stout, BA, CPC, COSC, PCS, CCS-P, Coder on Call, Inc., Milltown, New Jersey and coding division director, The Coding Network, LLC, Beverly Hills, CA.   

As most coders are aware, modifier 59 (Distinct procedural service) can separate CCI edits, but it is not meant to be utilized solely for that reason. In fact, CMS says in Transmittal R1422 (issued on Aug. 15) that many providers misuse it for this purpose, leading the modifier to be the source of a projected one-year error rate of $770 million. CMS points out the following three common reasons that people use modifier 59, along with the associated error odds, according to MLN Matters article MM8863, issued on Aug. 15:

• Infrequently used to identify a separate encounter, typically used correctly
• Less commonly utilized to define a separate anatomic site, less often used correctly
• Commonly used to define a distinct service, but frequently done so incorrectly

Say Hello to “EPSU” Modifiers

In light of the problems that CMS has faced when dealing with modifier 59, CMS felt the need to find a solution. “The 59 modifier often overrides the edit in the exact circumstance for which CMS created it in the first place,” the MLN Matters article says. “CMS believes that more precise coding options coupled with increased education and selective editing is needed to reduce the errors associated with this overpayment.” 

To that end, CMS has debuted the following new modifiers, known as the “X(EPSU)” modifiers:

• XE: Separate encounter (A service that is distinct because it occurred during a separate encounter). For instance, a patient presents to the office in the morning to have an abscess on her labia near her urethra incised and drained (56405). She returns in the afternoon to have a temporary catheter inserted because she states she cannot urinate and the physician decides to put in a temporary Foley (51702) until all the swelling has gone down. You will add modifier XE to 51702 to indicate it was performed at a different patient encounter.
• XP: Separate practitioner (A service that is distinct because it was performed by a different practitioner). Normally Medicare will reimburse an unaffiliated physician for performing a procedure that is bundled since the bundling edits apply to the billing surgeon, but when two physicians from the same practice each are performing a different procedure at the same operative session that would otherwise be bundled, this new modifier will make that clear. For instance, Dr. Bates is performing a laparoscopic paravaginal defect repair (57423) and calls Dr. Clark, an uro-gynecologist in his practice, to remove severe adhesions from the ureters. The claim will go in under the same tax ID number, the code 50715 will be listed first as it has greater relative value units and code 57423 will be reported with modifier XP.
• XS: Separate structure (A service that is distinct because it was performed on a separate organ/structure). For instance, Dr. Scott is performing the removal of endometrial implants around the left fallopian and in the cul-de-sac and notices that the right fallopian tube appears closed. He performs chromotubation on the right fallopian tube and notes that the right tube is blocked. Billing in this case would be 58662, 58350-XS.
• XU: Unusual non-overlapping service (The use of a service that is distinct because it does not overlap usual components of the main service). For instance, Mary has Medicare coverage and present at 20 weeks 4 days gestation with bleeding and labor pains. Her exam shows bulging membranes which rupture when the physician attempts to remove the cerclage suture. He notes a large rent in the cervix, but cannot get to the cerclage sutures as the patient is in active labor and beginning to bear down. The fetus and placenta are delivered a short time later through the rent in the cervix. He repairs the rent in the cervix following the delivery. In this case, the physician will code 59400-52 (Reduced services) since the patient delivered at 20 weeks and there were reduced antepartum services), and 57720-XU because the repair of the cervix is not part of the usual services for a vaginal delivery.

Although the new modifiers will replace modifier 59 in specific instances, CMS won’t cease accepting 59 in 2015. “CMS will not stop recognizing the 59 modifier but notes that CPT® instructions state that the 59 modifier should not be used when a more descriptive modifier is available,” says the Transmittal, which has an effective date of Jan. 1, 2015. “CMS will continue to recognize the 59 modifier in many instances but may selectively require a more specific X(EPSU) modifier for billing certain codes at high risk for incorrect billing.”

For instance, CMS is eventually going to institute edits that will allow the XE modifier to separate a specific CCI edit pair, but won’t accept modifier 59 or XU to separate that particular pair. As a way of easing into the new modifiers, CMS will initially accept either modifier 59 or the X(EPSU) modifier for a service, but “the rapid migration of providers to the more selective modifier is encouraged,” the MLN Matters article notes. However, MACs can start requiring the more specific modifiers in place of modifier 59 at their convenience, so keep an eye out for local requirements.

Keep in mind that CMS does not want you to play it safe and just add all of the modifiers to each CCI edit you’re trying to separate. Therefore, you can’t report both the 59 modifier and an X(EPSU) modifier on the same line item. In other words, “one would use either modifier 59 or one of the new X modifiers, not both,” Stout explained. “In time, CMS will be expanding on this program to allow only a certain X modifier or modifiers to override a CCI edit. It’s going to get very complicated.”

Resource: To read the transmittal, visit www.cms.gov/Regulations-and-Guidance/Guidance/Transmittals/Downloads/R1422OTN.pdf. To read the MLN Matter article, visit www.cms.gov/Outreach-and-Education/Medicare-Learning-Network-MLN/MLNMattersArticles/Downloads/MM8863.pdf.