Ob-Gyn Coding Alert
ICD-10-CM:
Heads Up: Your Dx Are Doing More Than Declaring Medical Necessity
Published on Fri Feb 23, 2018
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
- Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
- Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
- Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
- Instant access to every article ever published in Revenue Cycle Insider
- 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs
- The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more
Related Articles
Other Articles in this issue of
Ob-Gyn Coding Alert
- CCI 24.0:
Pay Attention to Modifier Indicators Included With These Numerous 38573, 58575 Edits
Even though you can report a modifier with 99483, modifier 59 may not be appropriate. [...] - ED Payments:
Guess What? Anthem Extends Policy Denying "Inappropriate" ED Visits to 3 More States
Take heart: Physician groups, lawmakers fight against expanded policy. Private insurer Anthem Blue Cross Blue [...] - ICD-10-CM:
Heads Up: Your Dx Are Doing More Than Declaring Medical Necessity
Here are the 'quality' pay implications you need to know. If you think of diagnosis [...] - You Be the Coder:
Hysteroscope With Retained Products of Conception
Question: We billed a 59820 – DX O02.1. The patient was still bleeding, so we [...] - Reader Question:
Here's How to Decide Between Pertinent, Complete PFSH
Question: Can you give me an example of pertinent PFSH versus complete PFSH? Florida Subscriber [...] - Reader Question:
Tackle CCI Versus CPT® Rules
Question: I used the Correct Coding Initiative (CCI) edits checker tool and entered 2 CPT® [...] - Reader Question:
Clarify is Key for BPP of Twin Ultrasounds
Question: My ultrasound tech scanned a patient with a twin pregnancy. The patient is 31.5 [...]
View All
