Ob-Gyn Coding Alert
Chart:
ICD-9-CM Changes Effective Oct. 1, 2003
Published on Fri Aug 01, 2003
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
Other Articles in this issue of
Ob-Gyn Coding Alert
- Get Ready for the New Diagnosis Codes
PMDD Tops List of Ob-Gyn ICD-9 Changes for Fall
With four significant changes and dozens of [...] - Chart:
ICD-9-CM Changes Effective Oct. 1, 2003 - New NCCI Takes Aim at Ob Pain Management
New bundles under the National Correct Coding Initiative (NCCI) mean you won't be able to [...] - News You Can Use
Good News! You Wont Have to Pay Refunds to Medicare
Due to the delayed implementation of [...] - You Be the Coder:
V Codes and Ob Ultrasound
Question: When our fertility patients get pregnant with twins and the ob performs the ultrasound, [...] - Challenge Inappropriate Bundling Edits
If you believe that you must take the National Correct Coding Initiative (NCCI) edits at [...] - Reader Question:
2 Lesions? Code for Both
Question: The ob-gyn excised two benign lesions of about the same size (roughly 0.8 cm) [...] - Reader Question:
Use 15839 for Excess Skin Excision
Question: The doctor performed a partial excision of the left labia minora for hypertrophy. How [...] - Reader Question:
Work With V Codes for Spontaneous Abortion Aftercare
Question: The ob-gyn saw a patient five weeks after a spontaneous complete abortion. Which diagnosis [...] - Reader Question:
Use 2 Codes for Inverted Hat Technique
Question: The physician noted that he performed laser vaporization of the ectocervix under colposcopic guidance [...] - Reader Question:
Bill BPP Separately From Ultrasound
Question: If I am performing a complete ultrasound (76805) or a detailed fetal anatomy (76811), [...] - Reader Question:
Inpatient or Outpatient Can Make All the Difference
Question: A patient at 39 weeks gestation was admitted to labor and delivery with severe [...]
View All
