Ob-Gyn Coding Alert
Case Study:
Navigate This Urogynecology Crossover Procedure
Published on Thu Mar 14, 2024
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
- Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
- Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
- Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
- Instant access to every article ever published in Revenue Cycle Insider
- 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs
- The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more
Related Articles
Other Articles in this issue of
Ob-Gyn Coding Alert
- Obstetrics:
Double Trouble: How to Code NSTs and BPPs for Twin Pregnancies
Learn different options to capture the extra work. When a patient who is carrying twins [...] - Case Study:
Navigate This Urogynecology Crossover Procedure
Avoid confusion by focusing on the code descriptors. Navigating the specialty of urogynecology can already [...] - Myth Busters:
Fibroid Coding Got You Frustrated? 5 Myth Busters Fix Your Claims
Find out what your fibroid diagnosis options are. If you’re reporting uterine fibroid removal, you [...] - You Be the Coder:
Prophylactical Placement of Ureteral Stents
Question: If the ob-gyn places catheters for identification of the ureters (52005) during a gyn procedure [...] - Reader Questions:
Count Oocytes for 89280-89281
Question: Codes 89280 and 89281 don’t have a National Correct Coding Initiative (NCCI) edit, but payers [...] - Reader Questions:
Include Hymenectomy As Part of Surgery
Question: One of our providers performed a hysteroscopy dilation and curettage for removal of a uterine [...] - Reader Questions:
Repeat Pap Plus Urinary Tract Infection
Question: A Medicare patient who is high risk due to sexual behavior came in for her [...]
View All
