OASIS Alert
Don't waste your time with an extra face-to-face visit when you don't have to.
That's the takeaway from a recent question-and-answer issued by Medicare Administrative Contractor
"In this instance, the same face-to-face encounter could be utilized for both home health admissions," NHIC replies in the ACT summary.
But home health agencies may not like another of NHIC's answers to a F2F question quite as much. "If a home health patient was scheduled to have the face-to-face encounter on day 10, but transferred to hospice on day eight, and is now refusing to go to the doctor for the home health face-to-face encounter, would this be considered an exceptional circumstance?" a provider asked in the conference.
"The face-to-face encounter is a requirement for payment," NHIC says. "The home health services could not be billed if it does not occur."
NHIC also reminds providers that they must have the signed F2F documentation in hand before billing Medicare for an episode. "You cannot bill Medicare until you have the signed documentation," NHIC explains. "The face-to-face encounter is part of the re-certification."
Resource:
The four-page ACT summary is online at www.medicarenhic.com/RHHI/billing/J14%20HHH%20ACT8311QAs.pdf.If you want to protect your workers and patients
against infections, you may want to change where you're looking. A study published in a recent American Journal of Infection Control found that "cell phones used by patients and their visitors were twice as likely to contain potentially dangerous bacteria as those of healthcare workers," states a press release on the research. The study focused on hospital patients, but the results can give home care providers food for thought on teaching patients how to limit their own infection risk.Findings:
Samples from almost 40 percent of 133 patients' phones had the bacteria compared to about 21 percent of 67 healthcare workers' phones, according to the study authored by researchers at the Inonu University in Malatya, Turkey. Additionally, seven patient phones contained multidrug resistant (MDR) pathogens such as MRSA. By contrast, the testing didn't uncover any hospital employee phones that had MDR bacteria.OASIS Alert
- Item Focus:
M1024: Keep Your Eye on Case Mix Diagnoses for Accurate Reimbursement
Do you know the three situations in which it's appropriate to complete M1024? You have [...] - M1024:
Expert Sheds Some Light on Risk Adjustment Grey Area
Must you sacrifice risk adjustment to CMS's letter of the law? At one time, there [...] - Clip & Save:
Deploy this Tool to Help Decrease Hospitalization
Don't wait until you have time to make your own screening tool. Try this one. [...] - Wound Care:
Master Healing Status of Stasis Ulcers or Risk Losing $367 Per Episode
Avoid the one response you can never list in M1334. If your responses to the [...] - Know Your Ulcer Types
There are two types of ulcers that receive special attention on the OASIS assessment -- pressure [...] - Keep Wound Healing Criteria Handy for M1334
When responding to OASIS questions about the healing status of wounds, look to this guidance [...] - Home Health Compare:
Get the Latest from CMS on Nonambulatory Fall Risk
Response from CMS leaves agencies wondering. The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) has [...] - Face To Face:
OASIS Guidance Brings Troubling F2F News
Confusion persists over how to handle a missed encounter and the start of care. A [...] - ICD-9:
Prepare for a Slew of New Case Mix Codes in 2012
Welcome improved dementia reporting. If you thought you'd have minimal 2012 ICD-9 updates to remember [...] - Reader Question:
Get Straight on Reverse Staging
Question: I know that Stage 3 and 4 pressure ulcers never heal and should always [...] - Industry Notes:
Don't waste your time with an extra face-to-face visit when you don't have to.
That's the takeaway from a recent question-and-answer issued by Medicare Administrative Contractor NHIC. "If a [...]
