Neurosurgery Coding Alert
You Be the Coder:
Nail Anatomy Question on PET Scan
Published on Thu May 05, 2022
Question: Notes indicate our provider performed ‘PET scan, whole body.’ I reported 78811 and 78812 and received a denial. What did I do wrong? Oklahoma Subscriber Answer: Instead of reporting your two-code combination, you should have just reported 78813 (Positron emission tomography (PET) imaging; whole body) instead. The two codes you reported were both for “half” of the body: 78811 (… limited area (eg, chest, head/neck)) and 78812 (… skull base to mid-thigh). This might be the best coding course if 78813 didn’t exist — but it does, and you should use it for whole-body positron emission tomography (PET) scans.
Related Articles
Other Articles in this issue of
Neurosurgery Coding Alert
- Surgery Coding:
Listen to Experts on Stereotactic Cranial Radiosurgery
Alternative to more invasive surgery has trio of key of add-ons. When your surgeon performs [...] - Injections:
Get Your Nerve (Knowledge) Up for These Injection Claims
Here’s why you need to know the difference between trigeminal and greater occipital nerves. When [...] - E/M Coding:
Max Out Claims by Knowing Non-Face-to-Face Time
Know how to capture work that occurs beyond the patient encounter. Every coder knows how [...] - You Be the Coder:
Nail Anatomy Question on PET Scan
Question: Notes indicate our provider performed ‘PET scan, whole body.’ I reported 78811 and 78812 and [...] - Reader Questions:
Parse Spinal Canal MRIs by Anatomy
Question: Encounter notes indicate that the provider performed the following: “MRI cerv. spinal canal w/contrast …MRI [...] - Reader Questions:
Dive Deep Into Notes for Skull Fracture Fix Code
Question: The surgeon performed elevation of a depressed skull fracture. How should I report this surgery? [...] - Reader Questions:
Arnold-Chiari = Encephalocele
Question: Encounter notes indicate that a patient suffered from “arnold chiari type 3.” How should I [...]
View All
