Neurosurgery Coding Alert

You Be the Coder:

Don't Code AV Malformations as Complex Aneurysms

Question: The neurosurgeon repaired an intracranial arteriovenous (AV) malformation on a patient, and we reported 61697 -- only to receive a denial. Why did the insurer deny our claim? Aren't AV malformations considered complex aneurysms?

South Carolina Subscriber

Answer: An AV malformation is not the same as a complex aneurysm, which is why you received a denial for reporting 61697 (Surgery of complex intracranial aneurysm, intracranial approach; carotid circulation).
 
An AV malformation represents a variety of structurally abnormal blood vessel types. Some examples include arteriovenous malformation, capillary hemangioma and venous angioma.
 
In contrast, an aneurysm represents a weakening of an arterial blood vessel wall, resulting in a dilated outpouching from the weak-walled vessel, rendering it susceptible to rupture.
 
When your surgeon treats an AV malformation with excision, choose a code from the 61680-61692 code set, depending on the notes from the encounter.
 
So if the notes indicate that the neurosurgeon treated a simple supratentorial AV malformation, you-d report 61680 (Surgery of intracranial arteriovenous malformation; supratentorial, simple) for the service.
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in Revenue Cycle Insider
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more

Other Articles in this issue of

Neurosurgery Coding Alert

View All