Neurosurgery Coding Alert

Safeguard Your Spinal Instrumentation Claims by Busting These 5 Myths

Eradicate same-session arthrodesis errors by not mixing -segments- with -interspaces.- You can obliterate spinal instrumentation coding errors as long as you know the location and type of instrumentation. Face these five myths to discover the coding realities. Highlight This First When Coding Instrumentation Myth #1: When coding instrumentation, you need to know the type of device before anything else. Reality: When you choose CPT codes for instrumentation, location -- rather than the type of device -- is the most important selection criterion. -I would first look at the approach: anterior versus posterior,- confirms Rebecca Woodward, CPC, coding representative for MedVentures, LLC in High Point, N.C. Instrumentation may be described as anterior (attaching to the front portion of the spine or vertebral segment, toward the -center- of the body) or posterior (attaching to the back of the spine or vertebral segment, facing toward the back), and can consist of rods, cages, plates, wires, [...]
You’ve reached your limit of free articles. Already a subscriber? Log in.
Not a subscriber? Subscribe today to continue reading this article. Plus, you’ll get:
  • Simple explanations of current healthcare regulations and payer programs
  • Real-world reporting scenarios solved by our expert coders
  • Industry news, such as MAC and RAC activities, the OIG Work Plan, and CERT reports
  • Instant access to every article ever published in Revenue Cycle Insider
  • 6 annual AAPC-approved CEUs
  • The latest updates for CPT®, ICD-10-CM, HCPCS Level II, NCCI edits, modifiers, compliance, technology, practice management, and more

Other Articles in this issue of

Neurosurgery Coding Alert

View All