Question: Are there any advantages to choosing critical care codes rather than standard E/M codes? Pennsylvania Subscriber Answer: You should choose the appropriate E/M code based on proper coding and documentation. An advantage to using critical care codes (99291-99292), however, is that your local carrier may pay more for these codes than for high-level E/M codes (for example, 99205 and 99215 for outpatients, or 99223 and 99233 for inpatients). For instance, HGS Administrators (HGSA) in Pennsylvania pays about $256 for 99291. On the other hand, if you submitted level-five new patient code 99205 to HGSA, you could expect about $180, a difference of $76. But to improve your reimbursement, you must medically justify using 99291-99292, or your insurer may deny your claim. Often coders resist using 99291 (Critical care, evaluation and management of the critically ill or critically injured patient; first 30-74 minutes) and +99292 (... each additional 30 minutes [List separately in addition to code for primary service]) because they believe the codes are meant for hospitals. But, you may use these higher-paying codes even in the office if you follow CPT's guidelines for reporting critical care services. For three key points of CPT's definition of critical care, review the following: As an added advantage, you may find critical care easier to document than other E/M services, as you must note only the time spent, and the specifics of the need for and provisions of the critical care the surgeon provides.