Neurosurgery Coding Alert

Evaluation and Management:

Untangle Review of Systems Knots To Accurately Choose Level 4 and 5 E/M Codes

Is each system documented? If not, prepare to assign a lower code.

Level-four and level-five office visits are not uncommon in a neurosurgery practice, but if you incorrectly tally the history, exam, and medical decision-making (MDM), you will miss out on the higher level codes you could report.

A subsequent element for the historical portion of an E/M service, after the chief complaint (CC) and the history of the present illness (HPI), is the review of systems (ROS) -- this portion of the E/M service trips up many coders because often they must select a lower code simply because the provider didn't document pertinent negative responses or inappropriately used the statement "all systems negative."

Ensure you're properly counting your neurosurgeon's ROS with this primer so you're not overcoding or undercoding his E/M services.

Differentiate ROS Levels

"The review of systems is a subjective account of a patient's current and or past experiences with illnesses and or injuries affecting any of the 14 applicable organ systems," explains Nicole Martin, CPC, manager of the medical practice management section of the Medical Society in New Jersey in Lawrenceville.

You'll need to know the differences between the three ROS levels to determining the proper level of history and therefore, E/M code level:

Problem-pertinent: A problem-pertinent ROS occurs when the physician reviews a single system during the encounter, presumably the system directly related to the problem identified in the patient's history of present illness (HPI). For a neurosurgery practice, "pertinent" refers to the nervous system, which means the neurosurgeon reviews at least one item within that system.

A problem-pertinent ROS supports a level two new patient E/M service (99202) or a level three established patient E/M service (99213).

Extended: When the physician conducts an extended ROS, he should review a "limited" number of systems. According to Medicare (and most other payers), "limited" should be a total of two to nine systems including the nervous system.

An extended ROS can support a level three new patient service (99203) or a level four established patient service (99214).

Although a neurosurgeon primarily treats the nervous system, it is often important to understand the "larger picture," as there may be factors that are pertinent to the neurological problem. For example, the presence of urological dysfunction and visual disturbances may influence medical decision making, explains Gregory Przybylski, MD, director of neurosurgery at the New Jersey Neuroscience Institute, JFK Medical Center in Edison.

When your physician reviews 10 or more systems, he achieves a complete ROS. A complete ROS can support a level four or five new patient E/M (99204-99205) or a level five established patient visit (99215).

Learn the Systems You Will Be Counting

In performing an ROS of the nervous system, your neurosurgeon may be looking for include symptoms such as weakness, numbness, paresthesias, atrophy, and gait impairment.

In addition to the nervous system, there are 13 other systems your neurosurgeon might review: constitutional; eyes; ears, nose, and throat; cardiovascular; respiratory; gastrointestinal; musculoskeletal; integumentary; neurological; psychiatric; endocrine; hematologic/lymphatic; and allergic/immunologic, Martin explains.

Example: A new patient presents with severe headaches, double vision and blackouts. The patient is questioned on the characteristics of the headaches, visual changes specific to the nervous system, and syncope. Your neurosurgeon moves on to the exam and makes a decision from that information. This represents a problem-pertinent ROS. In the same example, your neurosurgeon may also ask about fever (constitutional), abdominal pain (gastrointestinal), and excessive thirst (endocrine), which may result in an extended ROS.

"If the neurosurgeon goes further and asks about blurred vision, loss of hearing, skipped heart beats, sleep apnea, limb weakness, abnormal skin pigmentation, depression, and bleeding disorders, then a complete system review would have been performed, potentially resulting in choosing a higher level E&M service if the criteria are also met in the other areas of history, physical and medical decision making," Przybylski advises

How it works: Your neurosurgeon must individually document the systems with positive or pertinent negative responses. For any remaining systems up to the required 10, he can make a notation that all other systems are negative. "Other" is the key word. If you don't see that sort of notation, the physician must then document at least 10 individual systems to be able to assign a complete ROS.

Tip: Remind your surgeon to document every system he reviews so you can count it in your coding. Many physicians document only positive findings, but documenting negative findings is just as important for supporting the billable E/M level. If your neurosurgeon doesn't document the work, he won't get credit for it. You'll have no choice but to code a lower level visit if you can't justify the ROS portion.

Determine Who Can Record the ROS

The surgeon does not necessarily need to record the ROS himself. "The ROS may be documented by the patient or auxiliary staff as long as the physician/NPP initials and dates patient populated forms and states they reviewed and/or agree with this documentation," Martin says.

Example: "ROS can be done by a physician assistant (PA), nurse practitioner (NP), and sometimes a medical assistant (MA)," explains Ruth Borrero, claims analyst at Prohealth Care in Lake Success, N.Y. You may even have the patient fill out an ROS questionnaire, which the doctor reviews and signs.

"It helps our doctors and nurse practitioners to have the patient fill out a questionnaire that addresses their problems when they come to an appointment to make sure that all problems are address during their encounter," says Becky Boone, CPC, CUC, certified reimbursement assistant for the University of Missouri Department of Surgery in Columbia. "I encourage this as a good way to make sure that ROS is documented completely."

Other Articles in this issue of

Neurosurgery Coding Alert

View All