Neurosurgery Coding Alert
MDM Is at Center of ED Code Refocus
Check out the new rules for 99281-99285. When coding for evaluation and management (E/M) services in the emergency department is going to be different in 2023 … a lot different. Neurosurgery coders — most of whom don’t code for ED services often — will need to be on their toes for ED E/M claims that come across their desk next year. “We are excited to embrace what will most likely be a once-in-a-career update to evaluation and management documentation guidelines for emergency medicine,” says Sarah Todt, RN, CPMA, CPC, CEDC, CPCO, executive director, revenue integrity at LogixHealth in Bedford, Massachusetts. Read on to check out just what’s changing when you code your first ED E/M after the changes take effect on Jan. 1, 2023. ED Changes Mirror Office E/M Changes … to a Point As everyone knows, there were significant changes in the descriptors for office/outpatient E/M codes 99202 (Office or other outpatient visit for the evaluation and management of a new patient, which requires a medically appropriate history and/or examination and straightforward medical decision making. When using time for code selection, 15-29 minutes of total time is spent on the date of the encounter.) through 99215 (Office or other outpatient visit for the evaluation and management of an established patient, which requires a medically appropriate history and/or examination and high level of medical decision making. When using time for code selection, 40-54 minutes of total time is spent on the date of the encounter.) in 2021. CPT® overhauled the descriptors for each of these codes, eliminating the language about three key components: history, examination, and medical decision making (MDM). In place of the three key components, CPT® made time or MDM (one or the other, not both) the sole deciding factor in E/M level selection. “For many years, professional medical associations have advocated to replace the contrived bulleted system of reporting E/M service levels based on the three ‘key components’ with one based on the primary worked performed by the physician: medical decision making,” explains Gregory Przybylski, MD, Immediate Past Chairman of Neuroscience and Director of Neurosurgery at the New Jersey Neuroscience Institute, JFK Medical Center in Edison, New Jersey. The ED E/M revisions are reminiscent of those changes, with one big difference: the ED E/M codes will only allow coders to use MDM as the determining factor in code selection. This isn’t to say that you don’t need to document history or exam; but you don’t have to reach a certain level of history or exam (problem focused, straightforward, low, etc.) in order to select an ED E/M level. As the descriptor indicates, history and exam need to be “medically appropriate” for the encounter. No time for time? It might seem odd to some that time thresholds were not included in ED codes — but it wasn’t an arbitrary decision. “This [decision] is based on the significant variability in time spent for each level of service that has been observed, making it difficult to identify a single threshold that would reflect the various types of encounters that occur at each level of service in the emergency department,” explains Przybylski. Here’s What CPT® Is Deleting CPT® 2023 will delete the descriptors for the following codes: Here’s What CPT® Is Adding CPT® 2023 will add these descriptors for the above-listed codes: New Descriptors Provide Clarity, but Adjustment Could Hurt Overall, experts think that the new 99281-99285 descriptors will positively impact ED coding — but perhaps not in the short term. “We are grateful of the changes to the history and exam requirements are much more in line with clinical medicine,” explains Todt. “Additionally, we are looking forward to a more consistent approach to medical decision making.” “Overall, I think I feel positive about these changes as they do away with some of the crazy documentation requirements: e.g., complete ROS [review of systems] in the ED,” says Marcella Bucknam, CPC, CCS-P, COC, CCS, CPC-P, CPC-I, CCC, COBGC, revenue cycle analyst with Klickitat Valley Health in Goldendale, Washington. “But I don›t think it will be intuitive for providers to document this way.”
Related Articles
Neurosurgery Coding Alert
- CPT® 2023:
New Code Set Features Arthroplasty, Implant Changes
Here’s what you should report instead of +0163T in 2023. The AMA has set its [...] - E/M 2023:
MDM Is at Center of ED Code Refocus
Check out the new rules for 99281-99285. When coding for evaluation and management (E/M) services [...] - ICD-10 2023:
Codes Converted to Parent, Given New Families
See how some existing codes are modified to make way for new codes. In addition [...] - You Be the Coder:
Gamma Rays, Headframes, and Stereotactic Radiosurgery
Question: Encounter notes indicate that after a level-five office evaluation and management (E/M) service for a [...] - Reader Questions:
Head to This Code Set for Encephalocele Dx
Question: What is encephalocele, and how do I choose an ICD-10 code for this condition? New [...] - Reader Questions:
Ask More Questions on Sparse Spina Bifida Note
Question: Encounter notes indicate that the provider treated a patient suffering from spina bifida. That’s all [...] - Reader Questions:
No Shared Billing? Incident-to Could Be an Option
Question: One of our physicians and a nurse practitioner (NP) both saw a patient during a [...] - Reader Questions:
Rein in Behavior That Could Compromise ePHI
Question: A provider in our practice informed us that they have been sending patient records to [...]
