Observation services expansion eliminates payer coding variation. 2011 brings a new coding option when reporting the middle day of observations that last longer than normal. Check out this expert advice on how CPT additions will affect your neurologist's observation care services coding starting on Jan. 1, 2011. New Codes Offer Observation Clarity Until this point, coding for the "middle days" of an observation service caused problems. Although not the norm, there are times when a physician admits a patient to observation and she remains in that status for three or more days. Example: CPT 2011 addresses these middle days by introducing three new E/M codes. The additions parallel the hospital subsequent care series in terms of component requirements and time frames: 99224-99226 Stamp Out Insurer Variances Prior guidance for these "extended" observation and middle day observation stays created some confusion and led to several different policies, such as the Spring 1993 edition of CPT Assistant, which instructed coders to "use the unlisted evaluation and management service code (99499, Unlisted evaluation and management service) to report these services." Payers often took their own path, however, when setting policy on "middle day" observation coding. Payers would often call for 99499; some carriers, however, preferred 99231-99233 (Subsequent hospital care, per day, for the evaluation and management of a patient, which requires at least 2 of these 3 key components: ...) or 99211-99215 (Office or other outpatient visit for the evaluation and management of an established patient, ...). The new subsequent observation codes eliminate the confusion of how to report the middle day for observation cases that transcend three calendar days. Prepare for Disappointing Reimbursement Coders and physicians who were excited about the new subsequent care observation codes won't be jumping for joy when they hear the accepted payments for these codes. The Relative Value Update Committee had compared new codes 99224-99226 for subsequent observation care to subsequent hospital care and had requested the same work value. The Center for Medicare, however, disagreed with the proposal. "Instead, to recognize the differences in patient acuity between the two settings, we have removed the pre- and post-services times from the values, reducing the values to 75 percent of the value for subsequent hospital care codes," says Kenneth B. Simon, MD, MBA, CMS senior medical officer, in "Medicare Physician Payment Schedule 2010 Changes and Beyond" at the AMA CPT and RBRVS 2010 Annual Symposium in Chicago. At first, you might be disappointed with the accepted lower values, but you cannot disagree with the rationale that observation services do not have the same diagnostic severity and risk associated with morbidity between patientphysician encounters as hospital care services forcing me to begrudgingly agree with the Center for Medicare decision. Beware: