Medicare Compliance & Reimbursement
No Plans To Replace Recent Incident-To Advice From CMS
With the new guidelines just about to take effect, CMS scraps Transmittal 87 If you spent hours poring over the 23-page incident-to guidelines that CMS had planned to implement on June 2, you can forget everything you just learned. On the very day that practices were supposed to start using the new incident-to guidelines, CMS rescinded Transmittal 87, noting that the document "will not be replaced at this time." Possible rationale: Several medical associations expressed concern about the new guidelines, saying that practices didn't have enough time to learn all of the regs' nuances in the one-month period between the transmittal's publication (May 2) and the implementation date (June 2). In a May 21 letter to CMS Acting Administrator Kerry Weems, the AMA and the Medical Group Management Association (MGMA) asked CMS to delay the transmittal's implementation and to "reconsider the administratively burdensome and costly documentation requirements" that the incident-to transmittal would have required. At issue: The AMA/MGMA letter asked CMS to make the following changes before putting the incident-to transmittal into effect: • Remove the requirement that a clinic must be physician-owned and -operated before billing incident-to services • Delay Transmittal 87's implementation for six months • Reconsider the requirement for "explicit documentation in medical records" of the clinical personnel's credentials • Remove requirements that patient care plans explicitly reference services that will be provided as incident to • Remove references to the physician self-referral law (Stark). Reason for Rescinding Unclear CMS did not indicate that the AMA/MGMA letter had anything to do with its intention to scrap Transmittal 87. In fact, CMS did not reveal any reason at all for choosing to rescind the transmittal. "Not only did the AMA letter probably have something to do with it, but CMS' own contractors probably balked at the requirements," says consultant Randall Karpf with East Billing. "It takes a lot longer than one month for a Medicare carrier to implement new rules, and it's quite possible that the carriers told CMS that there was no way they could be compliant with the new regs by June 2." The rescinded transmittal is available on the CMS Web site at www.cms.hhs.gov.
Medicare Compliance & Reimbursement
- Compliance:
OIG Revisits Recommendation To Institute Edits
Office of Inspector General found 40 percent error rate on modifier 59 claims When the OIG [...] - Transmittals:
No Plans To Replace Recent Incident-To Advice From CMS
With the new guidelines just about to take effect, CMS scraps Transmittal 87 If you spent [...] - Modifiers:
Follow Medicare's New Nerve Injection Modifier Rules
CMS changes could put more money in your pocket As every coder knows, CMS updates can [...] - Medicare Errors:
SPECT Coding Tops CMS List Of 'No Documentation' Errors
CMS overpaid $15.2 million last year for 78465 -- here's how to avoid common mistakes Fail [...] - Reader Question:
Zoom In On 'Targets' Before Coding Moderate Sedation
Hint: You can't always bill moderate sedation separately Question: An established patient complaining of rectal pain [...] - Coding Coach:
Take Guesswork Out Of Coding For Teaching Physicians
Here's which modifier to use for the primary-care exception You can ensure that your physician [...] - Hospice:
New Regulation Clarifies Rights Of Hospice Patients
Changes in end-of-life care necessitated the overhaul The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services in [...] - Industry Notes:
Advisory Opinion Approves Hospital's Software That Communicates With Physicians' EHRs
Plus: Practitioners in S. Florida made up 20 percent of Medicare fraud cases When it comes [...]
