Medicare Compliance & Reimbursement
Make Sure Diagnoses Are in the Right Order
Question: Many of our ophthalmology patients claim general reasons for their visit, such as "I can't see well," or "My vision is foggy." We code these visits with 368.8 as the primary diagnosis because this is the primary reason for the visit. Any other problems or underlying causes of the blurry vision we report as secondary diagnoses. Is 368.8 the most appropriate code to use in these situations, and should we list it first? Answer: You should only report 368.8 (Other specified visual disturbances) as a primary diagnosis code when the ophthalmologist doesn't find a more definitive diagnosis during the course of the visit. Carriers often consider a visit for blurred vision the same thing as a routine exam -- and Medicare will not pay for this service. Primary vs. secondary: Whenever possible, you should list a more definitive diagnosis as primary and then the patient's complaint of blurred vision as secondary. For example, if the ophthalmologist discovers that a cataract is causing the patient's blurry vision, you would first list 366.12 (Incipient cataract) and then 368.8. You should always strive to report the most descriptive and accurate ICD-9 codes possible. If a patient claims her only reason for the visit is a routine exam, experts recommend that the ophthalmologist ask her a series of detailed questions to uncover any other complaints she may have but doesn't think of right away. In obtaining a comprehensive history when a patient denies any blurriness of vision, the ophthalmologist should also ask, "Do your eyes chronically itch, burn, or water?" This may lead you to report dry eye syndrome (375.15, Tear film insufficiency, unspecified) or allergic conjunctivitis (372.14, Other chronic allergic conjunctivitis). Do this: Rather than ask if a patient's vision is blurry, ask if there is anything she can't see well enough to do anymore (e.g. reading the paper, driving, watching television). Older patients sometimes expect a loss of vision and will not report something they think is "normal." The case history does not end until the patient leaves the office, so sometimes the true reason for the exam today is determined after the exam is completed.
Medicare Compliance & Reimbursement
- Payment:
Medicare Puts Details of Annual Wellness Exams in Writing
Medicare creates new denial codes that will apply when you bill AWV incorrectly. CMS has [...] - Trends:
Pumped Up Primary Care May Change Playing Field
There could be more associations between PCPs and specialists, expert predicts. "Primary care is carrying [...] - Diagnosis Coding:
Most Practices 'Surprised' By How All-Encompassing ICD-10 Transition Has Been
Best bet: Establish your initial plan for conversion immediately so you can project your practice's [...] - Tool:
ICD-10 Crosswalks: Never Fear-New Diagnosis Crosswalks Are Here
You'll benefit from the new code set, which includes 2011 diagnoses. In its attempt to [...] - Medicare Billing:
Never Report New Subsequent Observation Codes on the Same Day as Other E/M Code
Plus: CPT clarifies how you should calculate time when using it to pick an E/M [...] - What Do You Think?:
How Would Your Practice Handle This Scenario Involving a Free Med Sample?
Just because you provide a sample as part of care during a visit doesn't mean [...] - Industry News:
MedPAC Calls For 1% Increase to Hospice Payments
Medicare hospice spending has increased 300% over seven years. Hospices would see a 1 percent [...] - Reader Questions:
Patient's Self-Diagnosis May Not Stick
Question: A 48-year-old female, fearing she has H1N1, reports to the emergency department (ED) complaining [...] - Reader Questions:
Make Sure Diagnoses Are in the Right Order
Question: Many of our ophthalmology patients claim general reasons for their visit, such as "I [...]
