Medicare Compliance & Reimbursement
4 Major Perks of a New PAC Patient Assessment Tool
IMPACT Act paves the road for new and improved discharge methods.
Change isn’t a walk in the park, but experts agree that the Improving Medicare Post-Acute Care Transformation (IMPACT) Act of 2014 will bring a much-needed renovation to the current discharge and patient placement processes.
The law will require consistent, core data elements on each PAC setting’s assessment tool and eventually an assessment tool for all PAC settings to be used for transfer of care or discharge planning. Here are a few reasons why policymakers and providers support this move:
1) Medical decision-making in its rightful place. Picture a patient being discharged from acute care after a stroke-like event. Charles Crecelius, MD, PhD, CMD, chair of the Society for Post-Acute and Long-Term Care Medicine’s (AMDA) public policy committee, had such a patient recently. “Right now, the local insurance company is deciding whether she needs to be in an LTCH or SNF or if she needs home- and community-based services,” he says. “That really shouldn’t be an insurance company’s decision.”
A standardized tool, however, would give clinicians (in both acute hospital and PAC settings) more solid information to make the best decision of where to place the patient next.
2) Nationwide consistency. Patient placement varies widely from region to region — so are patients truly going where their needs will best be served, or just to the most popular setting in their area? “For example, home-and community-based services are used all the time in the Dakotas, but down in Missouri, they’re hardly ever used,” Crecelius points out.
3) A research goldmine. A universal tool (and core data elements on each setting’s tool) opens a great opportunity to collect consistent patient and outcomes data. With this information, providers can really start to target best practices in placing patients. “If I’m sending someone to an LTCH, why? What services would best meet their needs?” Crecelius says. “Data from other parts of the country could show best practices, so this would be a great research tool, and it’s frankly overdue.”
4) Smoother care transitions. Uniform patient information that can cross settings will lead to more efficient transitions and better care coordination. “There’s a lot of evidence about poor transitions leading to medication errors and a whole host of issues,” says Alex Bardakh, MPP, PLC, director of public policy for AMDA. And these problems could be mitigated with more coordinated care.
Medicare Compliance & Reimbursement
- Outpatient Outlook:
Tune In to Key Changes Listed in 2015 Medicare Physician Fee Schedule
Chronic care management gains big victory in new, reimbursable CPT code. Get ready for both [...] - Post-Acute Care:
4 Major Perks of a New PAC Patient Assessment Tool
IMPACT Act paves the road for new and improved discharge methods. Change isn’t a walk [...] - Audits and Records:
Are You Among the Providers Who Can't Produce Documentation?
Take note of the four-pronged approach used by CERT reviewers. You don’t want to cause [...] - Interpreter Services:
Provide Interpreter Services Without Hurting Your Bottom Line
Clear confusion surrounding these services. Providing services to patients who have limited abilities to communicate [...] - Reader Question:
Avoid 90662 for Patients Under 65
Question: We reported 90662 for a patient’s Fluzone shot and it was denied. The insurer said [...] - HIPAA:
Use OCR Guidance to Update Privacy Policies
The Windsor decision has effectively changed the meaning of three key terms. Federal law cannot [...] - Industry Notes:
CMS: Submit Requested Documentation within 45 Days,or Face Denials
If your payer is performing a pre-payment audit of your claims, the MAC will typically [...]
