Medicare Compliance & Reimbursement
Physician Spending Grew Much Less Quickly Than Industry Leaders Expected
There's no time to lose for physicians to save Medicare reimbursement from the 5.1-percent cut slated for next January. Congress has returned from its August recess--but plans to adjourn at the end of September for the election season.
Members of Congress are considering several different plans to rescue providers from steep payment cuts over the next few years ...quot; but only if providers take part in some programs to improve their quality or reduce their utilization (see story on page 2). As Congress considers its options, some good news and bad news for physicians has emerged:
Good news: Physician spending didn't grow as fast as the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) expected. That means that instead of increasing to nearly $100, Part B premiums will rise only to around $93.50 next year, officials announced. The 5-percent increase is considerably less than last year's sharp 17.4-percent increase, because physician spending is growing less quickly. But wealthy seniors will still pay between $106 and $162 per month.
Medicare actuaries had overestimated the rate of physician spending growth this year, because physicians have become more efficient at submitting claims more quickly, CMS Administrator Mark McClellan told reporters in a Sept. 12 conference call.
"We're seeing an acceleration in when services are paid," McClellan says. "More physicians are paying attention to their billing practices in Medicare" and using health information technology, he adds.
Because physicians are receiving payments faster, it looked as if Medicare was spending more than it actually was, McClellan explains.
The lower growth rate may decrease the pressure for spending cuts--but even with a 5.1-percent cut, physician spending won't go down, McClellan notes.
Bad news: But the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) said that it would cost a staggering $6 billion over 10 years just to replace next year's cut with a 1-percent increase.
To replace the formula that calls for cuts of 4 to 5 percent per year with an index for inflation would cost $200 billion over 10 years, the CBO said in a Sept. 6 issues brief.
Medicare Compliance & Reimbursement
- MEDICAID:
HHS Spends A Bundle On State-Based Programs For The Disabled, Chronically Ill
Industry leaders steering away from institutional programs.
The federal government is spending $20 million on grants [...] - PHYSICIANS:
Physician Spending Grew Much Less Quickly Than Industry Leaders Expected
Fight against 5.1-percent cut begins with time already running out.
There's no time to lose for [...] - HIPAA:
Stay HIPAA Compliant--Even When Every Second Counts
HHS lends a helping hand to providers dealing with emergency situations.
Health care providers now have [...] - REIMBURSEMENT:
Congress Considers Plan That Would Keep Payment Cuts For Some Doctors
Can a lame duck save physicians from the chopping block?
Forget pay-for-performance. One new plan in [...] - MEDICARE FFS:
Providers Are Happy With Their Contractors, New Survey Reveals
Rural health centers. SNFs most pleased with their FI contractors.
Providers are content with their Medicare [...] - HOSPITALS:
U.S. Hospitals Rack Up Big Bills Nationally
Find out which conditions cost payers, patients the most.
In 2004, the United States' collective hospital [...] - ORTHOPEDICS:
Medicare Changes Multiple Procedure Indicator For Arthroscopy
Say goodbye to 50-percent pay cut for G0289.
You can look forward to $48 more in [...] - DERMATOLOGY:
Don't Give Up On Reimbursement For G0168
Getting paid for simple repairs isn't always simple.
Sometimes the carriers move in mysterious ways--and providers [...] - FRAUD & ABUSE:
Suppliers Beware--The Feds Are Watching Your Medicaid Billings
Bonus: Federal appeals court rejects 'no harm, no foul' argument regarding false Medicare claims.
Three medical [...] - INDUSTRY NOTES:
PE-RVU Changes Could Cut Major Procedures By 10 Percent
Plus: OIG uncovers $20 million in Medicare overpayments for radiology services.
If the Centers for Medicare [...]
