Medicare Compliance & Reimbursement
Patient Discharge Rule Confounding - And Pending
Every discharged patient must be issued notice. Problems With New Notices Abound HHAs are chagrined that CMS seems to have taken almost no notice of the grave concerns they raised in response to the final rule, which did allow comment submission. For example, health care attorney Elizabeth Hogue submitted a list of serious problems with the new notices, "but apparently it's just been ignored," she fumes.
A massive new paperwork mandate requiring HHAs to issue a notice to every single patient they discharge is ready to land this summer, and it's as confusing as ever.
The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services has submitted its new termination and expedited review forms to the Office of Management and Budget for approval, according to a CMS notice in the April 29 Federal Register. The notices are virtually unchanged from the forms CMS issued in conjunction with its final rule on the matter last November.
Warning: The new termination notices will cause mass confusion, industry experts say.
"This will be a busy season for process changes," notes William Dombi, vice president for law with the National Association for Home Care & Hospice's Center for Health Care Law.
Here are top problems with the notices:
Physician orders: During the new 72-hour expedited review that the notice can trigger, CMS instructs HHAs and hospices to continue services for the three-day period. But home care providers can't furnish services without a physician's order under the Medicare Conditions of Participation, protests consultant Lynn Yetman with Reingruber & Co. in St. Petersburg, FL.
Appropriate usage: The instructions for using the new termination notices are highly confusing, experts agree. CMS has not clarified whether patients will sometimes receive termination notices, ABNs or both at the end of their care - and why.
Timeline: Requiring HHAs to furnish the new termination notices at least two days prior to discharge will likely mean an extra visit for many beneficiaries, expects Hogue, based in Burtonsville, MD.
That's a huge burden, especially for rural providers who travel long distances to reach patients
Medicare Compliance & Reimbursement
- HOSPITALS:
E/M Visit Levels Are Safe From RAC Scrutiny
... but CMS may examine medical necessity of the claims.
Good news for hospitals: Medicare's new [...] - HOSPITALS:
Project Progressing: CMS Touts P4P Demo
3-year incentive project already improving care, says McClellan.
The early word is good on quality of [...] - HOME HEALTH:
Patient Discharge Rule Confounding - And Pending
Every discharged patient must be issued notice.
A massive new paperwork mandate requiring HHAs to issue [...] - HOME HEALTH:
Expect Deadline For Termination Notices To Hold
Despite confusion, don't bet on extension of July 1 deadline.
In its final rule in the [...] - PHYSICIANS:
Extra Scribbles Can Lead To Fines, Jail Time
Make sure doctors date all new entries on patient records.
Physicians who suspect that someone in [...] - PHARMACEUTICALS:
Rules For Multi-Drug Concurrent Infusion Vary By Area
The answer is hiding in carriers' local coverage decisions.
The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services [...] - MEDICAID:
Budget Socks Medicaid With $10 Billion In Cuts
Clinton leads a group of vocal, displeased Dems.
If the hard part was deciding whether [...] - MEDICAID:
States Recommend Ways To Ease Medicaid Cuts
Could higher Medicaid copays be on the horizon?
The National Governors Association and the National Conference [...] - LABS:
Providers Must Stay Posted On MSP Changes
Modifications could severely affect secondary payer rules.
The last thing a lab needs is to be [...] - ENFORCEMENT WATCH:
Subsidiaries Cannot Sidestep Fraud Penalties - REHAB:
Recent Report Could Mean More Admissions Scrutiny
GAO charges providers with 'sloppy' admissions practices - and fallout is expected.
The long-awaited report from [...] - BILL WATCH
The following bills were introduced in the House: H.R. 2051. A bill to amend title [...]
